The 893.101 meme also provides:
(1) The ... cases of Scott v. State, [808 So. 2d 166] (Fla. 2002) and Chicone v. State, 684 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1996), holding that the state must prove that the defendant knew of the illicit nature of a controlled substance found in his or her actual or constructive possession, were contrary to legislative intent.
(2) ... [K]nowledge of the illicit nature of a controlled substance is not an element of any offense under this chapter. Lack of knowledge of the illicit nature of a controlled substance is an affirmative defense to the offenses of this chapter.
(3) [When] a defendant asserts th[is] affirmative defense ..., the possession of a controlled substance, whether actual or constructive, shall give rise to a permissive presumption that the possessor knew of the illicit nature of the substance [and] the jury shall be instructed on the permissive presumption ....
893.101 Video Update
Drug Charges? Call 813-222-2220
Update August 5 - One Federal Defense Attorney has Reported:
"If an 851 is pending, challenge it under 21 USC 851(c). It looks like you can proceed under 851(c)(2) even if sentence was already imposed by showing “good cause” for the failure to raise it before sentencing."
The report continues: "Career offenders, ACCA, and those with increased criminal history category will need to go back to state court and get the conviction vacated with a post-conviction motion. If the D[efendant] was already sentenced, the D[efendant] can return to federal court with a 2255 after getting the state conviction vacated. See Johnson v. United States, 544 U.S. 295 (2005); Custis v. United States, 511 U.S. 485 (1994)."
Timing is Critical - Call 813-222-2220 to Get Started
"You need to exercise “due diligence” in getting the conviction vacated in state court, then file the 2255 within one year. Although “due diligence” has not been quantified in terms of exactly how long the D[efendant] has to start the proceedings, in Johnson, the Supreme Court said that “diligence can be shown by prompt action on the part of the petitioner as soon as he is in a position to realize that he has an interest in challenging the prior conviction with its potential to enhance the later sentence.” 544 U.S. at 308.
For pending cases, "If the D[efendant] is not yet sentenced, you could ask for a variance."
Casey's Qualifications are here: http://www.centrallaw.com/CentralLawQualifications.html
Florida Drug Law Statute 893
Drug Charges in Florida? Call 813-222-2220