Prosecutors in drug cases have great discretion when it comes to filing, adding, reducing, or even dismissing criminal charges. This prosecutorial discretion gives prosecutors the ability to negotiate with a vast amount of tools. The negotiated plea offer, therefore, is one of the most prevalent and important tools to the State. We know that a defendant never wants a prosecutor to begin negotiations with: “We want the maximum sentence!” So here is a list of the top three things that anger prosecutors and what we can do to help:

1. Serious Charges

The defendant who is charged with a “serious” offense starts off on the wrong side of the prosecutor. Most notably, cases that involve minors as victims, death or serious bodily injury to others, and high levels of fraud or theft have prosecutors seeing red. Because of the serious nature of these charges, prosecutors will often typecast a defendant and ignore anything remotely positive or good about them.

What we can do:
Our firm always approaches each case with great attention to detail. We will look for ways to dismiss the charges when legally justified—such as statute of limitations issues, immunity, or double jeopardy. If dismissal is not possible, we pursue lesser included charges or prepare to fight in court with a well-crafted trial strategy.

2. New Charges While a Case is Pending

No matter the severity of a crime, prosecutors get downright Hulk-like if a defendant is charged with a new offense while on pre-trial release. When this happens, prosecutors often file a motion to revoke bond and typically increase the severity of their plea offer. The new charges signal to prosecutors that the defendant is not taking their case seriously.

What we can do:
We can challenge the basis of the new arrest or seek to reinstate bond if it was revoked. Our firm will evaluate all possible defenses to the new charge and may negotiate a wraparound plea deal. The goal is to minimize exposure and avoid stacking penalties across multiple cases.

3. Failures to Appear

There have been times when I’ve shown up to court but my client did not. This relatively minor act makes prosecutors’ blood boil. A failure to appear can result in an additional criminal charge and weaken the defendant’s negotiating position. A prosecutor may double down on their sentence recommendation or oppose any further leniency.

What we can do:
We will advocate for you in court and explain any mitigating reasons for your absence—car trouble, illness, or miscommunication. If a capias (arrest warrant) is issued, we’ll file a motion to withdraw it to help avoid jail time. Our goal is to keep you out of custody and your case on track.

If you’re facing drug charges in Florida, every move matters—especially when prosecutors are already on edge. I’m W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., a Board-Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer with decades of experience defending clients in high-stakes cases. Don’t give the State any extra ammunition. Call me today at 813-222-2220, read more about my credentials, or send a confidential message here. Let’s take action before the prosecution does.

3 Mistakes That Make Prosecutors Furious in Drug Cases | Florida Criminal Defense Attorney Explains

Avoid the top 3 things that instantly anger prosecutors in Florida drug cases. Criminal Defense Attorney W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. breaks down what not to do if you’re facing drug charges—and how to protect your freedom. Learn more at https://drug2go.com/

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do prosecutors get angry when new charges are filed during pretrial release?

When a defendant is arrested again while already out on bond, prosecutors may view it as a sign that the person is disregarding the court process. This often results in a revoked bond and a harsher plea offer. Prosecutors may also feel embarrassed or pressured if they previously recommended leniency. Contact our office quickly if you’re facing this issue so we can take immediate legal action.

What happens if I miss a court date in my drug case?

Missing a court date can trigger a warrant for your arrest and, in some cases, result in a new criminal charge for Failure to Appear. Prosecutors see this as a disrespectful act, which often increases the severity of any plea deal. However, if the failure was accidental or unavoidable, we can often file a motion to withdraw the warrant. Learn how Attorney Casey Ebsary handles these situations.

Can a drug case be dismissed if the evidence was obtained illegally?

Yes. If the police obtained evidence through an unlawful search or seizure, we can file a motion to suppress. If successful, the State may not have enough remaining evidence to continue prosecuting the case. This is one of many ways our firm protects your constitutional rights in court.

Do prosecutors have to offer me a plea deal in my drug case?

No, prosecutors are not legally required to offer a plea deal, but most do because trials are time-consuming and costly. The nature of the charges and your criminal history will heavily influence the offer. A strong legal defense can improve your negotiation position. Schedule a consultation with Casey the Lawyer to learn how we negotiate.

Will prosecutors treat me differently if my charge involves fentanyl or opioids?

Yes. Drug cases involving fentanyl, heroin, or synthetic opioids tend to anger prosecutors more due to the ongoing overdose crisis. These substances carry severe mandatory minimums in Florida. We explore every avenue—from constitutional defenses to diversion eligibility—to protect your future and freedom.

What if this is my first drug offense—will I still make prosecutors mad?

First-time offenders are less likely to face an angry prosecutor, especially if the charges are minor. However, behavior like failing to appear in court or getting re-arrested can quickly turn a manageable case into a difficult one. That’s why proactive legal representation is critical. Reach out today before your situation escalates.

Why do prosecutors get upset by “serious charges”?

Prosecutors are often under pressure when handling serious charges such as drug trafficking, overdoses resulting in death, or cases involving minors. These offenses carry mandatory minimums and generate public scrutiny, which can limit the prosecutor’s flexibility in negotiations. As a result, they may approach the case more aggressively and refuse to consider diversion or reductions. Our firm knows how to challenge the evidence, highlight your personal background, and shift the focus toward a fair resolution—learn more here.

What is a “wrap offer,” and why would it help if I have multiple drug charges?

A wrap offer is a plea deal that resolves all pending charges in one agreement, often allowing a more favorable sentence than if the cases were handled separately. Prosecutors may offer these to streamline the court calendar or to avoid the risk of losing at trial. When properly negotiated, wrap deals can reduce jail time, consolidate probation, and avoid mandatory minimums. Contact us to see if this strategy could help your case.

Is it better to explain myself directly to the prosecutor?

No, speaking directly to a prosecutor without legal counsel is risky and can make things worse. Prosecutors are trained to listen for admissions and may become irritated if they believe you are minimizing the charges or evading responsibility. Your attorney knows what to say, how to say it, and when to push back or seek a better offer. Let Casey the Lawyer do the talking for you.

How can your firm help calm down an angry prosecutor?

We know how to defuse prosecutorial frustration by staying professional, presenting strong legal defenses, and offering strategic alternatives. Our experience shows that even hostile prosecutors can be persuaded with the right mix of facts, law, and diplomacy. Whether it’s clarifying a misunderstanding or showing why harsh punishment is unnecessary, we aim to shift the case back toward fairness and resolution. Reach out now so we can start building your defense.

When prosecutors are angry, they push harder for the harshest penalties—but with the right defense, you can shift the momentum in your favor. Whether you’ve missed court, picked up new charges, or are facing serious allegations, we know how to manage the damage and protect your record. Don’t wait until it’s too late—contact me now or call 813-222-2220 to set up a free consultation. You can also learn more about my experience and courtroom credentials here. Let’s start building your defense today.

Trafficking in Illegal Drugs (4 to 14 Grams) – Florida Statute 893.135(1)(c) – Charge Code DRUG3912

Charged with Drug Trafficking in Florida? A conviction for Trafficking in Illegal Drugs (4 to 14 grams) under Florida Statute § 893.135(1)(c) DRUG3912 carries a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 3 years and a $50,000 fine — even if you never intended to sell or distribute the drugs. If you’ve been arrested for this serious felony charge, it’s time to speak with a knowledgeable criminal defense attorney who understands Florida’s complex drug laws.

Florida’s DRUG3912 Charge Explained

• Charge Code: DRUG3912
• Statute: Florida Statute § 893.135(1)(c)
• Offense: Trafficking in Illegal Drugs (4 to 14 grams)
• Felony Level: First-Degree Felony
• Jurisdiction: Commonly charged in Hillsborough County and throughout Florida

What Is Considered “Trafficking” Under Florida Law?

In Florida, trafficking isn’t just about selling drugs. You can be charged with trafficking simply for possessing a minimum quantity of specific controlled substances.

For opiates and opioid derivatives, the law sets the trafficking threshold at just 4 grams. This includes:

• Oxycodone (OxyContin, Percocet)
• Hydrocodone (Vicodin, Norco)
• Heroin
• Hydromorphone (Dilaudid)
• Morphine
• Opium and its derivatives
• Fentanyl and analogs

Even if the substance is mixed with fillers, Florida law considers the total weight of the mixture, not just the pure drug.

Special Focus: Fentanyl and Its Impact on Drug Trafficking Cases

Fentanyl is an especially dangerous drug and a primary target under Florida’s trafficking laws due to its potency and the lethal risk it poses. Even small amounts of fentanyl or its analogs can easily exceed the 4-gram trafficking threshold. Additionally, fentanyl mixtures (like counterfeit pills) often lead to unintentional trafficking charges, even if you were unaware of the presence of fentanyl.

Fentanyl-related Trafficking Penalties

If you are caught trafficking fentanyl, the penalties are the same as for other drugs, but the seriousness of the offense is heightened. The presence of fentanyl often leads to heightened scrutiny, especially if the trafficking leads to harm or death.

Common Controlled Substances Under DRUG3912

Florida law targets various illegal drugs under the trafficking statute. Common substances associated with DRUG3912 charges include:

• Heroin
• Fentanyl and Fentanyl Analogues
• Oxycodone
• Hydrocodone
• Morphine
• Hydromorphone
• Opium

Even if a substance contains a mixture of these drugs, it’s the total weight that determines the charge, not the concentration of the active ingredient.

Penalties for Drug Trafficking (4 to 14 Grams) in Florida

Florida law imposes mandatory minimum sentences based on the weight of the controlled substance involved. Here’s how that breaks down:

Mandatory Minimum Sentences Under § 893.135(1)(c)

Judges have no discretion to go below these minimums unless you qualify for a legal exception, such as substantial assistance to law enforcement.

Elements the State Must Prove

To convict you under Florida Statute 893.135(1)(c), prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you:

1. Knowingly:
   • Sold,
   • Purchased,
   • Manufactured,
   • Delivered,
   • Brought into Florida, or
   • Possessed
2. A controlled substance listed in the statute (such as heroin, hydrocodone, or oxycodone)
3. In a quantity of 4 grams or more (up to 14 grams)
4. With knowledge of the substance’s illicit nature

Even without direct proof of a sale, simply possessing 4 grams or more of certain drugs can result in trafficking charges.

Understanding Possession: Actual vs. Constructive

There are two primary forms of drug possession in Florida law:

Actual Possession

• The drug is on your person (in your pocket, purse, etc.), or
• Within your immediate control (e.g., under your car seat)

Constructive Possession

• The drug is in a place you control (like your house or glovebox), and
• Prosecutors must prove you knew it was there and had control over it

Constructive possession cases can be successfully challenged with the help of a seasoned attorney.

Legal Definitions You Need to Know

Understanding how Florida defines certain terms is critical:

• Sell – Exchange for money or something of value
• Purchase – Acquire by paying money or other value
• Manufacture – Produce, prepare, or package a controlled substance
• Deliver – Actual or attempted transfer of a substance
• Possess – Exercise of control over a substance, even without ownership

Top 5 Defenses to Florida Drug Trafficking Charges

1. Lack of Knowledge
   You didn’t know the substance was present or illegal. Especially powerful in constructive possession cases.
2. Unlawful Search or Seizure
   Evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches may be suppressed.
3. Entrapment
   You were persuaded or tricked into committing the offense by law enforcement.
4. Insufficient Evidence of Weight
   The total mixture must exceed 4 grams. Lab errors or flawed weighing can be challenged.
5. Chain of Custody Issues
   Mishandling or improper documentation of the seized drugs can result in suppression of evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions About DRUG3912 – Trafficking in Illegal Drugs (4 to 14 Grams)

What does DRUG3912 mean under Florida law?

DRUG3912 is the Florida offense code for Trafficking in Illegal Drugs where the total weight is 4 grams or more but less than 14 grams. This typically involves opioids like heroin, oxycodone, or hydrocodone. The charge is a first-degree felony and comes with a mandatory minimum of 3 years in prison and a $50,000 fine. Even if you didn’t intend to sell the drug, you can still be charged based on weight alone.

Can I be charged with trafficking just for having pills or a small amount?

Yes. In Florida, drug trafficking charges are based on the total weight of the substance, including any fillers or inactive ingredients. For example, having just a few opioid pills can easily exceed 4 grams. This means even a person struggling with addiction — not selling — can face severe prison time.

Is intent to sell required for a trafficking charge in Florida?

No. Intent is not required for a trafficking charge under Florida Statute 893.135(1)(c). Simply possessing the threshold amount (4 grams or more) is enough to trigger a trafficking charge. That’s why people are often surprised to face such serious penalties for simple possession.

What is the mandatory minimum sentence for DRUG3912?

The mandatory minimum for DRUG3912 is 3 years in Florida State Prison and a $50,000 fine. Judges have no discretion to go below this sentence unless the defendant provides “substantial assistance” to law enforcement. Without such cooperation, the sentence is automatic upon conviction.

Can the weight be challenged in court?

Yes. Your attorney can challenge the lab testing procedures or argue that the mixture included legal substances that should not count toward the total weight. Mistakes in weighing or improper evidence handling could reduce or dismiss the charge. Every gram matters in trafficking cases.

What if the drugs weren’t mine or I didn’t know they were there?

This is a common and powerful defense. If the drugs were found in a shared space — like a car or apartment — prosecutors must prove you had knowledge and control of them. If they cannot, the case may be dismissed due to insufficient evidence of possession.

Can the police search my car or home without a warrant?

Only under certain circumstances. If law enforcement violates your Fourth Amendment rights, your attorney can file a motion to suppress the evidence. Illegal searches are a leading reason trafficking charges get dropped or reduced.

What is substantial assistance and can it reduce my sentence?

Substantial assistance means helping law enforcement catch other drug traffickers. If you qualify and the State agrees, your sentence can be reduced below the mandatory minimum. However, this option carries serious risks and should only be pursued with a lawyer’s advice.

Can I get drug court or probation instead of prison?

Not usually for DRUG3912. Because of the mandatory minimum sentence, drug court and probation are generally not available unless the charge is reduced or you provide substantial assistance. An experienced attorney may be able to negotiate a lesser charge like possession.

What should I do right now if I’ve been charged with trafficking?

Call an experienced criminal defense lawyer immediately. Do not speak to law enforcement without legal representation. Your attorney can review the legality of the search, examine the evidence, and begin building a defense to avoid harsh mandatory sentencing.

Why Hire W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr.?

Attorney W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. is a Board-Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer based in Tampa, Florida. With decades of experience and a deep knowledge of Florida’s drug laws, he defends clients charged with serious felonies — including trafficking under DRUG3912.

What You Get:

• Aggressive representation in court
• A thorough review of search and seizure legality
• Experience negotiating with prosecutors and challenging mandatory minimums
• Personal, one-on-one attention from an experienced litigator

Contact Us Now for a Free Case Review

Facing a trafficking charge can upend your life. Don’t fight it alone.

Law Office of W.F. Casey Ebsary Jr.
Call Now: (813) 222-2220 or 1-877-793-9290

Original Post from 2018 Updated Above to 2025

Drug Trafficking

Trafficking 4 to 14 Grams Morphine, Opium, Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, Hydromorphone

“shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 3 years”

If you have been charged with DRUG3912 TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS 4 TO 14 GRAMS you can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney for FREE at 813-222-2220 to fight for you or a friend.
Trafficking drugs under Florida is based upon the weight of the substance, not the actual conduct of the person who has been charged. The crime can be committed even if no drugs were actually sold to anyone. The mere possession of a scheduled compound, in the requisite amount can generate a charge of drug trafficking.

“Constructive possession means the controlled substance is
in a place over which the (defendant) has control,
or in which the (defendant) has concealed it.”

Form Code: DRUG3912

Florida Statute: 893.135.1C1A
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 1st

Description: TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS 4 TO 14 GRAMS

Trafficking 4 to 14 Grams Morphine, Opium,
Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, Hydromorphone

DRUG3912 TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS 4 TO 14 GRAMS is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.

Chapter 893 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL


893.135 Trafficking; mandatory sentences; suspension or reduction of sentences; conspiracy to engage in trafficking.

(1) Except as authorized in this chapter or in chapter 499 and notwithstanding the provisions of s. 893.13:

(c)1. Any person who knowingly sells, purchases, manufactures, delivers, or brings into this state, or who is knowingly in actual or constructive possession of, 4 grams or more of any morphine, opium, oxycodone, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, or any salt, derivative, isomer, or salt of an isomer thereof, including heroin, as described in s. 893.03(1)(b), (2)(a), (3)(c)3., or (3)(c)4., or 4 grams or more of any mixture containing any such substance, but less than 30 kilograms of such substance or mixture, commits a felony of the first degree, which felony shall be known as “trafficking in illegal drugs,” punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. If the quantity involved:

a. Is 4 grams or more, but less than 14 grams, such person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 3 years, and the defendant shall be ordered to pay a fine of $50,000.

“To prove the crime of Trafficking in Illegal Drugs, the State must prove . . .”

Florida Jury Instruction on TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS

§ 893.135(1)(c), Fla. Stat.

            Certain drugs and chemical substances are by law known as “controlled substances.” (Specific substance alleged) or any mixture containing (specific substance alleged) is a controlled substance.

            To prove the crime of Trafficking in Illegal Drugs, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

            1.         (Defendant) knowingly

                                    [sold]

                                    [purchased]

                                    [manufactured]

                                    [delivered]

                                    [brought into Florida]

                                    [possessed]

                        a certain substance.

2.         The substance was [morphine] [opium] [oxycodone] [hydrocodone] [hydromorphone] [heroin] [(specific substance alleged)] [a mixture containing [morphine] [opium] [oxycodone] [hydrocodone] [hydromorphone] [herion] [(specific substance alleged)]].

3.         The quantity of the substance involved was 4 grams or more.

            See State v. Dominguez, 509 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 1987).

4.         (Defendant) knew that the substance was [[morphine] [opium] [oxycodone] [hydrocodone] [hydromorphone] [heroin] [(specific substance alleged)] [a mixture containing [morphine] [opium] [oxycodone] [hydrocodone] [hydromorphone] [heroin] [(specific substance alleged)]].

            If applicable under the facts of the case and pursuant to § 893.135(2), Fla. Stat., the following bracketed language should be given instead of element 4 above.  For example, if it is alleged that the defendant intended to sell heroin but actually sold (specific substance alleged), the alternate element 4 would be given.

[4.        (Defendant) intended to [sell] [purchase] [manufacture] [deliver] [bring into Florida] [possess] (an enumerated controlled substance in § 893.135(1), Fla. Stat.), but actually [sold] [purchased] [manufactured] [delivered] [brought into Florida] [possessed] (specific substance alleged) or a mixture containing (specific substance alleged).]

            Definitions.  Give as applicable.

            Sell.

            “Sell” means to transfer or deliver something to another person in exchange for money or something of value or a promise of money or something of value.

            Manufacture.  § 893.02(13)(a), Fla. Stat.

            “Manufacture” means the production, preparation, packaging, labeling or relabeling, propagation, compounding, cultivating, growing, conversion or processing of a controlled substance, either directly or indirectly.  Manufacturing can be by extraction from substances of natural origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis. It can also be by a combination of extraction and chemical synthesis.

            Deliver.  § 893.02(5), Fla. Stat.

            “Deliver” or “delivery” means the actual, constructive, or attempted transfer from one person to another of a controlled substance, whether or not there is an agency relationship.

            Possession.

            To “possess” means to have personal charge of or exercise the right of ownership, management, or control over the thing possessed.

            Possession may be actual or constructive.

            Actual possession means:

a.         The controlled substance is in the hand of or on the person, or

b.         The controlled substance is in a container in the hand of or on the person, or

c.         The controlled substance is so close as to be within ready reach and is under the control of the person.

            Give if applicable.

            Mere proximity to a controlled substance is not sufficient to establish control over that controlled substance when it is not in a place over which the person has control.

            Constructive possession means the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) has control, or in which the (defendant) has concealed it.

            In order to establish constructive possession of a controlled substance if the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) does not have control, the State must prove the (defendant’s) (1) control over the controlled substance and (2) knowledge that the controlled substance was within the (defendant’s) presence.

            Possession may be joint, that is, two or more persons may jointly possess an article, exercising control over it. In that case, each of those persons is considered to be in possession of that article.

            If a person has exclusive possession of a controlled substance, knowledge of its presence may be inferred or assumed.

            If a person does not have exclusive possession of a controlled substance, knowledge of its presence may not be inferred or assumed.

            Knowledge of the illicit nature of the controlled substance.  Give if applicable.  § 893.101(2) and (3), Fla. Stat.

            Knowledge of the illicit nature of the controlled substance is not an element of the offense of (insert name of offense charged).  Lack of knowledge of the illicit nature of a controlled substance is an affirmative defense.  (Defendant) has raised this affirmative defense.  However, you are permitted to presume that (defendant) was aware of the illicit nature of the controlled substance if you find that (defendant) was in actual or constructive possession of the controlled substance.

            If from the evidence you are convinced that (defendant) knew of the illicit nature of the controlled substance, and all of the elements of the charge have been proved, you should find (defendant) guilty.

            If you have a reasonable doubt on the question of whether (defendant) knew of the illicit nature of the controlled substance, you should find (defendant) not guilty.

            See State v. Weller, 590 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 1991).

            If you find the defendant guilty of Trafficking in Illegal Drugs, you must further determine by your verdict whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that:

            Enhanced penalty.  Give if applicable up to extent of charge.

a.         [The quantity of the substance involved was 4 grams or more but less than 14 grams.]

b.         [The quantity of the substance involved was 14 grams or more but less than 28 grams.]

c.         [The quantity of the substance involved was 28 grams or more but less than 30 kilograms.]

d.         [The quantity of the substance involved was 30 kilograms or more.]

Lesser Included Offenses

Comment

This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1985 [477 So. 2d 985], 1987 [509 So. 2d 917], 1989 [543 So. 2d 1205], 1997 [697 So. 2d 84], and 2007 [969 So. 2d 245].  See also SC03-629 [869 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004)].

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Arrested for a Federal Drug Crime? We Can Help.

If you’ve been charged under USCA0003 for Manufacture, Distribution, Dispensing, or Possession of a Controlled Substance under 21 U.S.C. § 841, you’re facing serious federal charges. This statute covers a wide range of illegal drug activities, and penalties can include long prison sentences, hefty fines, and asset forfeiture. Understanding the specifics of this charge is crucial for building a strong defense. Contact the Law Office of W F Casey Ebsary Jr. to learn how we can help protect your rights and fight these charges effectively.

If you or a loved one is facing federal drug charges, you are at risk of severe penalties—including lengthy prison sentences, massive fines, and asset forfeiture. Federal prosecutors pursue drug offenses aggressively under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 841–865.
You need a skilled federal criminal defense attorney who knows how to fight back.

At Law Office of W F Casey Ebsary Jr, we have the experience, knowledge, and resources to stand between you and the full force of the federal government.

What Does the Charge Code “Manufacture, Dist, Dispense, Possess Con Sub- Fed USCA0003 021.841” Mean?

If you’ve been charged with Manufacture, Distribution, Dispensing, or Possession of a Controlled Substance (Federal) under the USCA0003 code and 21 U.S.C. § 841, here’s what it means:

• Manufacture, Distribution, Dispensing, or Possession: This code covers a broad range of illegal drug activities. It could involve:
  • Manufacturing controlled substances (e.g., creating or producing illegal drugs).
  • Distributing controlled substances (e.g., selling or giving drugs to others).
  • Dispensing controlled substances (e.g., distributing drugs unlawfully).
  • Possessing controlled substances with the intent to distribute or sell them.
• Controlled Substances: These are drugs classified under federal law as illegal or controlled. It can include narcotics, prescription drugs, or other illicit substances.
• Federal Law (21 U.S.C. § 841): Under 21 U.S.C. § 841, the federal government regulates the possession, manufacture, and distribution of controlled substances. If you’re facing charges under this statute, it typically means the alleged crime has a federal aspect, such as crossing state lines, involving federal property, or dealing in large quantities of drugs.

What Are the Penalties for 21 U.S.C. § 841?

The penalties for violating 21 U.S.C. § 841 are severe and depend on the type of drug involved and the quantity. Some penalties include:

There can also be fines and asset forfeiture, depending on the amount and nature of the drug involved.

What Should You Do if Charged?

If you’re facing a charge under 21 U.S.C. § 841, you need an experienced federal drug defense lawyer. The Law Office of W F Casey Ebsary Jr. is here to defend your rights and explore all possible defenses, including challenging evidence, negotiating plea deals, or seeking case dismissal.

Contact us today for a confidential consultation, and let’s work on defending your future.

Common Federal Drug Crimes We Defend

• Drug Trafficking (21 U.S.C. § 841): Manufacturing, distributing, or possessing with intent to distribute controlled substances.
• Drug Conspiracy (21 U.S.C. § 846): Agreement between two or more people to commit a drug crime.
• Possession with Intent to Distribute (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)).
• Importation/Exportation of Drugs (21 U.S.C. § 952).
• Operating a Drug House (21 U.S.C. § 856).
• Using a Communication Facility (21 U.S.C. § 843(b)): Using phones or the internet to facilitate drug crimes.

Federal Drug Crime Penalties

See the full statutes at 21 U.S.C. Part D.

Top 5 Defenses to Federal Drug Charges

• Illegal Search and Seizure: Evidence obtained without a valid warrant may be suppressed.
• Lack of Knowledge or Intent: You must knowingly possess or distribute the substance.
• Entrapment: You were improperly induced by law enforcement to commit a crime.
• Insufficient Evidence: Challenging the quantity, type, or possession of drugs.
• Constitutional Violations: Violations of Miranda rights or due process.

Frequently Asked Questions About Federal Drug Charges

What makes a drug case “federal” instead of “state”?

Drug crimes become federal when they involve large quantities, cross state lines, happen on federal property, or involve federal agencies like the DEA.
Learn more: 21 U.S.C. Part D

Can I be charged with conspiracy even if I never touched the drugs?

Yes. Under 21 U.S.C. § 846, simply agreeing to participate in a drug crime—even without handling drugs—can result in the same penalties as if you committed the crime yourself.

What are mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes?

Many federal drug offenses carry mandatory minimum sentences of 5, 10, or even 20 years based on the type and quantity of drug, and prior convictions.
(See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b))

What is a “safety valve” in federal sentencing?

The “safety valve” allows certain non-violent, first-time drug offenders to avoid mandatory minimum sentences under specific conditions.
(See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f))

How quickly should I hire a lawyer after being contacted by federal agents?

Immediately. Federal agents rarely contact you unless they already have significant evidence. A lawyer can protect your rights and possibly prevent charges from being filed.

Why Choose Law Office of W F Casey Ebsary Jr?

• Over 30 years of experience in federal criminal defense
• Aggressive pre-trial motions to exclude illegal evidence
• Proven track record of dismissals, acquittals, and favorable plea deals
• Available 24/7 for emergency consultations

Your freedom is too important to leave to chance. Let’s fight back together.

Call 813-222-2220 Now for a Free Confidential USCA0003 Consultation

Trafficking drugs in today’s complex legal landscape rquires an understanding the nuances of the law. My focus is on providing insightful analysis and understanding of legal matters, particularly those involving controlled substances and evolving legal definitions. The recent case of Pryce M. Campbell v. State of Florida (No. 2D2023-0651), where the distinction between legal hemp and illegal cannabis played a pivotal role, exemplifies the intricacies of these issues. Whether you are navigating similar challenges or simply seeking clarity on legal proceedings, you’ll find valuable information and perspectives here. Connect with me for further inquiries. I have included the complete court ruling at the bottom of this page.

Are you facing charges for felony possession of cannabis in Hillsborough County, Florida? The legal landscape surrounding cannabis is constantly evolving, and a conviction can have severe consequences. If you’re seeking experienced legal representation, W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. is here to help. With decades of experience in the Florida legal system, I am dedicated to providing aggressive and effective defense strategies tailored to your specific situation. Contact me today at 813-222-2220 for a consultation.

Trafficking Drugs at Tampa International Airport?

Why was Campbell arrested?

Campbell was arrested because police found two large duffle bags in his possession at Tampa International Airport that contained fifty vacuum-sealed bundles of a green, leafy substance. They suspected this substance to be cannabis, and after obtaining a warrant, seized the bags. Subsequent testing of one sample from these bundles confirmed it contained cannabis, leading to his arrest and charges for trafficking in cannabis.

The Facts

The Case of Pryce M. Campbell: A Detailed Summary Introduction

Pryce M. Campbell was arrested and charged with trafficking in cannabis between twenty-five and two thousand pounds. His case, Pryce M. Campbell v. State of Florida (No. 2D2023-0651), was appealed, and the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, ultimately reversed his trafficking conviction. The central issue revolved around the sufficiency of evidence presented by the State of Florida to prove the quantity of cannabis involved, especially in light of the legalization of hemp.

Events at Tampa International Airport

On July 13, 2022, Tampa International Airport Police Department was conducting narcotics interdiction and monitoring United Flight 314, which arrived from Denver, Colorado. A drug interdiction team, including three detectives and a K-9 unit, was present. After the flight arrived, the K-9 unit performed a “run” on three trailers of luggage. The K-9 “alerted” to two identical large, soft-sided duffle bags. These bags were then placed on the baggage claim conveyor belt. Detectives observed Pryce Campbell claim the two duffle bags. He was stopped by detectives before he could exit the airport and identified himself as the owner of the bags. Campbell was initially allowed to leave, but the detectives seized his two bags and obtained a warrant to search them.

Discovery and Testing of the Contents

The following day, after obtaining a warrant, the detectives searched the duffle bags. Inside, they found two large vacuum-sealed packages, each containing twenty-five smaller, identically packaged vacuum-sealed bundles of a green, leafy substance. Each of the larger vacuum-sealed packages weighed 32.57 pounds. Due to suspicion that the substance was cannabis, a sample was taken from two of the smaller bundles, one from each duffle bag, and sent to the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) lab for testing. Importantly, a sample was not taken from each of the fifty individual bundles. The lab analyst ultimately tested only one of the samples, which weighed 24.47 grams plus or minus 0.15 grams, and concluded that the substance contained cannabis.

Arrest and Charges

Following the positive lab test for cannabis in the single sample, Campbell was called back to the airport and arrested. He was charged with one count of trafficking in cannabis in an amount exceeding twenty-five but less than two thousand pounds. At trial, Campbell testified that he believed the bags contained hemp, which he had purchased in Oregon. He claimed to have bought fifty bundles of hemp for $50 each, stating that purchasing marijuana would have been significantly more expensive.

Legal Arguments and Court Decision

Campbell’s defense focused on the argument that the State failed to prove the requisite amount of illegal cannabis for trafficking because only one of the fifty packages was chemically verified as cannabis. He pointed to the changes in Florida and federal law that legalized hemp, arguing that law enforcement was required to chemically test every individually wrapped package to establish the statutory threshold weight for trafficking in a controlled substance.

The court agreed with Campbell’s argument.The court noted that until July 2019, cannabis was defined to cannabis with a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration below 0.3 percent—was removed from the definition of marijuana and legalized. The court emphasized that legal hemp and illegal cannabis are indistinguishable by appearance, texture, and odor.

Therefore, chemical testing to determine the THC content is now necessary to avoid misidentification.Because only one bundle from Campbell’s bags was chemically verified as illegal cannabis, and an inference of illegal cannabis could not be extended to the remaining untested bundles, the State did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that each of the remaining bundles contained illegal cannabis. As a result, the court concluded that the trial court erred in denying Campbell’s motion for judgment of acquittal for trafficking in cannabis.

Outcome and Remand

The court reversed Campbell’s conviction for trafficking in cannabis. However, the court found that the State did establish that Campbell was in possession of illegal cannabis weighing less than twenty-five pounds, based on the 24.47-gram sample from one bundle that tested positive for cannabis. Therefore, the case was remanded to the trial court with directions to reduce Campbell’s conviction to felony possession of cannabis and to resentence him accordingly.

Implications of the Tampa Airport Drug Trafficking Case

This case highlights the importance of precise identification and measurement in drug trafficking cases, especially when legal and illegal variants of the same plant exist. It underscores the burden of proof on the State to establish that each package contains illegal cannabis in order to meet the statutory weight threshold for trafficking. Furthermore, it demonstrates how changes in legislation, such as the legalization of hemp, can significantly impact legal proceedings and evidentiary requirements.

10 Q&A based on the Airport Bust

What was Pryce Campbell’s initial charge?

Pryce Campbell was initially charged with trafficking in cannabis in an amount exceeding twenty-five but less than two thousand pounds. This charge stemmed from the discovery of two large duffle bags in his possession at Tampa International Airport containing numerous vacuum-sealed bundles of a green, leafy substance. The State believed this substance to be cannabis, leading to his arrest and subsequent charges.

Why did the police seize Campbell’s luggage at the airport?

The police seized Campbell’s luggage after a K-9 unit alerted to two identical large, soft-sided duffle bags he claimed at baggage claim, indicating the presence of illicit substances. Though Campbell was initially allowed to leave, the detectives seized his bags and obtained a warrant to search them due to the suspicion of narcotics trafficking. This action was part of a narcotics interdiction operation monitoring flights from Denver, Colorado.

What was the central issue in Campbell’s appeal?

The central issue in Campbell’s appeal was whether the State of Florida provided sufficient evidence to prove the quantity of illegal cannabis necessary for a trafficking conviction. Specifically, the question revolved around whether the State needed to test every individual bundle of the green, leafy substance or if testing just a sample was adequate. Campbell argued that the legalization of hemp required testing each bundle to distinguish it from illegal cannabis.

How did the legalization of hemp affect Campbell’s case?

The legalization of hemp significantly impacted Campbell’s case because it created a legal substance that is indistinguishable from illegal cannabis by sight, smell, or texture. This meant that law enforcement could no longer rely on these characteristics to identify the substance as illegal cannabis without chemical testing. As a result, the court ruled that each bundle needed to be tested to determine its THC content and legality.

What was Campbell’s defense at trial?

At trial, Campbell testified that he believed the bags contained hemp, which he had purchased in Oregon, not illegal cannabis. He claimed to have bought fifty bundles of hemp for $50 each, asserting that purchasing marijuana would have been significantly more expensive. Campbell’s defense hinged on the idea that he was transporting legal hemp, not illegal cannabis, and that the State had failed to prove otherwise.

What did the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) lab testing reveal?

The FDLE lab tested only one of the samples from the fifty bundles found in Campbell’s luggage, and that single sample tested positive for cannabis. The lab analyst concluded that the tested sample, which weighed 24.47 grams, contained cannabis, but no other samples were tested. This limited testing became a critical point in Campbell’s appeal.

How did the court rule on Campbell’s motion for judgment of acquittal?

The court ruled in favor of Campbell, reversing his conviction for trafficking in cannabis, stating that the State failed to prove the requisite amount of illegal cannabis for trafficking. The court found that since only one bundle was tested and identified as cannabis, the State did not establish beyond a reasonable doubt that each of the remaining bundles was also illegal cannabis. As a result, the trial court erred in denying Campbell’s motion for judgment of acquittal.

What was the final outcome of Campbell’s case?

While Campbell’s trafficking conviction was reversed, the court found that the State did establish he was in possession of illegal cannabis based on the one tested sample. Therefore, the case was remanded to the trial court with directions to reduce Campbell’s conviction to felony possession of cannabis and to resentence him accordingly. This meant Campbell was still guilty of possessing cannabis, but not of trafficking it.

Why was the “Greenwade” exception no longer applicable in Campbell’s case?

The “Greenwade” exception, which previously allowed for non-chemical identification of marijuana, was no longer applicable because it relied on the assumption that any green, leafy substance with the characteristics of cannabis was illegal. With the legalization of hemp, which is indistinguishable from illegal cannabis, there was an “identifiable danger of misidentification,” thus requiring chemical testing to differentiate between legal and illegal substances. This change in the law invalidated the previous exception.

What was the significance of the court’s decision regarding the burden of proof?

The court’s decision emphasized the State’s burden of proof in trafficking cases, particularly when legal and illegal variants of a substance exist. The ruling clarified that the State must establish that each package contains illegal cannabis to meet the statutory weight threshold for trafficking. By requiring chemical testing of each bundle, the court protected the defendant’s presumption of innocence and ensured that the State could not rely solely on appearance and odor to infer illegality.

What is the legal status of hemp in Florida?

Based on the case, hemp is legal in Florida. It states that the Florida Legislature enacted the “State hemp program” in July 2019, making the possession of hemp legal. It also clarifies that hemp is defined as cannabis with a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration below 0.3 percent.

Given the complexities and evolving nature of drug laws, as seen in the Pryce M. Campbell v. State of Florida case, it’s clear that understanding the nuances of legal definitions and evidentiary standards is essential. Navigating these challenges requires informed guidance and a deep understanding of current legislation.

• Florida Drug Court – Sample Agreement
• Constructive Possession of Cocaine in Florida – Conviction Tossed
• Submarine and Defendants Are Sunk | Tampa Cocaine Attorney
• Science and Florida Prosecutors on Cannabis Prosecution
• Drug Dogs | Florida Tosses Search

If you or someone you know is facing similar legal issues related to controlled substances, or if you simply need clarification on the latest legal developments, don’t hesitate to seek expert advice. Contact W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr. today for a consultation and ensure you have the knowledge and representation you deserve.\

Drug Trafficking Court Ruling

Opinion_2023-0651 – Download

Facing Fentanyl Charges in Hillsborough County, FL (2025)?

Facing Fentanyl charges in Hillsborough County demands immediate legal action from a skilled Florida drug defense attorney. Whether accused of Fentanyl possession or the much more severe charge of Fentanyl trafficking, the potential consequences under Florida law are devastating. Mandatory minimum sentences tied to specific weights mean even small amounts can trigger years in prison, making experienced legal counsel essential. The synthetic opioid nature of Fentanyl contributes to its danger and the state’s aggressive prosecution.

Introduction: The Alarming Rise of Fentanyl Charges in Hillsborough County

If you or a loved one has been arrested for a Fentanyl-related offense in Hillsborough County, Florida, you are facing one of the most serious legal challenges imaginable. In 2025, Florida law enforcement and prosecutors are aggressively targeting the possession, distribution, and trafficking of Fentanyl due to its extreme potency and devastating impact on communities. A conviction carries severe penalties, including lengthy mandatory minimum prison sentences, substantial fines, and a permanent criminal record that can shatter your future.

Get Aggressive Defense Now! | W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr.

The stakes are incredibly high. You need immediate, experienced, and aggressive legal representation from an attorney who understands Florida’s complex drug laws and the specific landscape of the Hillsborough County criminal justice system.

My name is W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., and I am a criminal defense attorney dedicated to protecting the rights of individuals facing serious drug charges right here in Tampa and throughout Hillsborough County. We understand the fear and uncertainty that accompany a Fentanyl arrest. We are here to provide the powerful defense you need. Don’t face the power of the state alone. Call me immediately at 813-222-2220 for a confidential consultation.

You can contact the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. tel:+18132222220 for a free consultation by calling 1-877-793-9290 or by filling out our online contact form. (https://drug2go.com/contact-casey-the-lawyer/).

What is Fentanyl and Why is it So Dangerous?

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid approved for treating severe pain, typically advanced cancer pain. However, its illicit manufacturing and distribution have caused a public health crisis. According to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Fentanyl is 50 to 100 times more potent than morphine and significantly stronger than heroin. Source: DEA – Fentanyl Facts

This extreme potency means even microscopic amounts can be lethal. Many individuals arrested for Fentanyl possession or trafficking may not even realize the substance they have contains Fentanyl, as it’s often mixed with other drugs like heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine, or pressed into counterfeit pills mimicking prescription opioids or benzodiazepines. This significantly increases the risk of accidental overdose and death. Source: CDC – Fentanyl Facts

Because of this danger, Florida lawmakers have enacted some of the toughest Fentanyl laws in the nation, focusing on harsh penalties even for relatively small amounts, particularly under trafficking statutes.

Fentanyl Laws in Florida (2025) – Possession vs. Trafficking

Florida Statutes Chapter 893 governs drug abuse prevention and control. Understanding the specific charges you face is critical. In Hillsborough County, Fentanyl cases typically fall into two main categories: Possession and Trafficking.

1. Possession of Fentanyl (Florida Statute § 893.13):
   • It is illegal for any person to be in actual or constructive possession of a controlled substance, including Fentanyl, unless obtained legally via a valid prescription.
   • Actual Possession: The drug is found directly on your person (e.g., in your pocket, hand).
   • Constructive Possession: The drug is found in a place over which you have control (e.g., your car, your room), and you knew it was there and knew it was illicit. Constructive possession cases often involve multiple people and require the prosecution to prove your specific knowledge and control, which can be a key area for defense.
   • Simple possession of any amount of Fentanyl (without intent to sell or traffic) is typically charged as a third-degree felony.
2. Trafficking in Fentanyl (Florida Statute § 893.135(1)(c)):
   • This is where Florida law becomes exceptionally severe. Trafficking charges are not based on proving an intent to sell or distribute; they are triggered solely by the weight of the mixture containing Fentanyl.
   • The thresholds are alarmingly low, and the penalties include significant mandatory minimum prison sentences, meaning a judge has little to no discretion to sentence below these minimums unless specific legal exceptions apply (like providing substantial assistance or qualifying for a drug court program, which is often difficult in trafficking cases).
   • These are first-degree felonies.

Understanding Mandatory Minimum Sentences

Mandatory Minimum

Sentences Fentanyl

Mandatory minimum sentences are a cornerstone of Florida’s aggressive stance against Fentanyl trafficking. It’s crucial to understand what they mean:

• No Judicial Discretion (Generally): If convicted of trafficking based on weight, the judge must impose at least the minimum prison sentence prescribed by law.
• No Gain Time: Often, mandatory minimum sentences must be served day-for-day, without the possibility of early release through “gain time” that might apply to other sentences.
• Harsh Reality: Even for first-time offenders, a conviction for trafficking a relatively small amount of Fentanyl mixture can lead to years or even decades in state prison.

Florida Fentanyl Penalties Table (2025 – Based on Florida Statute § 893.13 & § 893.135)

(Note: This table is for informational purposes. Penalties can be enhanced based on prior record, location of offense (near school/park), use of a firearm, etc. Always consult with an attorney for specifics related to your case.) [Source: Florida Legislature Statutes]

The Hillsborough County Context: Aggressive Enforcement

Hillsborough County, encompassing Tampa, Brandon, Plant City, and surrounding areas, is not immune to the Fentanyl crisis. The Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office (HCSO) and the Tampa Police Department (TPD) work aggressively, often in conjunction with state and federal agencies like the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and the DEA, to investigate and arrest individuals involved with Fentanyl.

The State Attorney’s Office for the 13th Judicial Circuit (Hillsborough County) takes these cases extremely seriously. Prosecutors are often instructed to seek stiff penalties, including mandatory minimum sentences, particularly in trafficking cases. They have significant resources and are experienced in building cases involving confidential informants, undercover operations, surveillance, and complex forensic evidence.

Facing these combined forces without skilled legal counsel is a perilous mistake. You need an attorney who regularly practices in Hillsborough County courts, knows the prosecutors and judges, and understands the specific procedures and tendencies within this jurisdiction.

Your Rights Matter: What to Do If Arrested for Fentanyl

If you are stopped, questioned, or arrested for a Fentanyl offense in Hillsborough County, remember these critical points:

1. Exercise Your Right to Remain Silent: You are not required to answer questions, explain yourself, or make any statements to law enforcement. Politely state, “I am exercising my right to remain silent, and I want to speak with my attorney.” Anything you say can and will be used against you. Don’t try to talk your way out of it; you will likely only make things worse.
2. Demand an Attorney Immediately: Clearly state that you want a lawyer. Once you invoke this right, police questioning related to the crime should cease until your attorney is present.
3. Do Not Consent to Searches: Police generally need a warrant, probable cause, or your consent to search you, your vehicle, or your home. Do not give consent. If police claim they have the right to search anyway, do not physically resist, but clearly state, “I do not consent to this search.” This preserves your ability to challenge the legality of the search later.
4. Be Polite but Firm: Do not argue, resist arrest, or be combative. Comply with lawful commands (like providing identification), but do not volunteer information or consent to searches.
5. Contact Casey Ebsary Immediately: The sooner you have an experienced attorney involved, the better. Call 813-222-2220. We can intervene early, potentially speak with investigators, represent you at first appearance and bond hearings, and begin building your defense strategy.

Potential Defenses Against Fentanyl Charges

An arrest does not automatically mean a conviction. There are numerous potential defenses to Fentanyl possession and trafficking charges. An experienced attorney like Casey Ebsary will thoroughly investigate the facts of your case to identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence and potential violations of your rights. Common defense strategies include:

• Illegal Search and Seizure: If law enforcement violated your Fourth Amendment rights by searching you, your car, or your property without a valid warrant, probable cause, or another legal exception, the evidence obtained (the Fentanyl) may be suppressed, potentially leading to dismissal of the charges.
• Lack of Knowledge: The prosecution must prove you knew the substance was present and knew it was illegal. If Fentanyl was found in a shared space (like a car with multiple occupants or a common area of a home) and you were unaware of its presence, this can be a defense.
• Constructive Possession Issues: In cases where you weren’t in actual possession, the state must prove both knowledge of the drug’s presence and dominion and control over it. We can challenge whether the state can meet this burden.
• Problems with the Substance: Was the substance properly tested? Was the chain of custody maintained? Were the lab procedures valid? Mistakes in handling or testing evidence can create reasonable doubt.
• Entrapment: If law enforcement induced you to commit a crime you otherwise wouldn’t have committed, entrapment may be a defense. This is complex and requires specific circumstances.
• Valid Prescription: While rare for illicit Fentanyl, if you had a legitimate prescription, this is an absolute defense to simple possession.
• Substantial Assistance: In some trafficking cases, providing significant information to law enforcement about other criminal activity might lead prosecutors to request a waiver or reduction of the mandatory minimum sentence. This is a risky path that should only be considered after careful consultation with your attorney.
• Challenging the Weight: Since trafficking charges hinge on weight, accurately determining the weight of the mixture containing Fentanyl (not just the pure Fentanyl) is crucial. Defense investigation may challenge the state’s weight measurements.

Helpful Table: Potential Defense Angles

Why Choose W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. for Your Hillsborough County Fentanyl Defense?

When your freedom and future are on the line, you cannot afford to settle for inexperienced or overworked representation. You need a dedicated advocate who will fight tirelessly for you. Here’s why clients choose Casey Ebsary:

1. Extensive Experience: I have years of experience defending clients against serious drug charges. I defend Complex Fentanyl possession and trafficking cases, in Hillsborough County and throughout Florida.
2. Local Knowledge: Practicing regularly in the 13th Judicial Circuit means I understand the local court system, the judges, the prosecutors, and the specific approaches taken in Hillsborough County drug cases. This local insight is invaluable.
3. Aggressive Defense Strategy: We don’t just wait for the prosecution to act. We proactively investigate your case, scrutinize the evidence, file motions to suppress illegally obtained evidence, and prepare meticulously for negotiation or trial.
4. Client-Focused Approach: We know this is a stressful and terrifying time. We provide personalized attention, keep you informed every step of the way, and are always available to answer your questions and address your concerns. Your case is our priority.
5. Proven Track Record: While no attorney can guarantee results, we have a history of achieving favorable outcomes for clients facing serious drug charges, including dismissals, reduced charges, avoidance of mandatory minimums, and acquittals at trial.
6. Understanding the Science: Fentanyl cases often involve complex forensic evidence. We work with experts when necessary to challenge lab reports, weight measurements, and other scientific aspects of the prosecution’s case.

How Casey Ebsary Can Fight Your Fentanyl Charges:

• Immediate Intervention: Getting involved early allows us to protect your rights from the outset, potentially influence charging decisions, and argue for reasonable bond conditions.
• Thorough Investigation: We don’t just rely on the police reports. We conduct our own investigation, interview witnesses, and gather evidence that may support your defense.
• Challenging Illegal Police Conduct: We meticulously review the circumstances of your arrest, search, and questioning to identify any constitutional violations that could lead to evidence suppression.
• Negotiating with Prosecutors: Leveraging our knowledge of the law, the facts of your case, and the local system, we negotiate forcefully with the State Attorney’s Office seeking dismissal, reduced charges, or alternatives to incarceration.
• Fighting Mandatory Minimums: We explore every legal avenue to challenge the applicability of mandatory minimum sentences or seek grounds for departure, including statutory exceptions or substantial assistance agreements (when appropriate and in your best interest).
• Trial Readiness: If a fair resolution cannot be reached through negotiation, we are experienced trial lawyers ready to vigorously defend you before a judge and jury.

Drug2Go.com

2102 W Cleveland St
Tampa, Florida 33606
Phone: 813-222-2220
Email: centrallaw@gmail.com

Navigating Serious Fentanyl Charges in Hillsborough County, Florida

Understanding the difference between actual and constructive possession is key, as are the specific weight thresholds for trafficking charges (4g, 14g, 28g). An effective defense attorney serving Hillsborough County will scrutinize every aspect of your case, from the initial stop and search to the forensic testing of the alleged Fentanyl. Potential defenses against drug charges include challenging illegal searches, questioning evidence handling, and disputing the prosecution’s ability to prove knowledge or control.

Don’t delay; the penalties for Fentanyl convictions are too high. Contacting a lawyer familiar with Hillsborough County courts and Florida statutes regarding Fentanyl is the most crucial step in protecting your rights and future when facing these serious drug crimes. Your choice of defense attorney can significantly impact the outcome of your Fentanyl case.

Frequently Asked Questions (Q&A) About Fentanyl Charges in Hillsborough County

What’s the difference between Fentanyl possession and trafficking in Florida?

Possession generally refers to having a small amount for personal use (a third-degree felony). Trafficking is based purely on the weight of the substance (or mixture containing it) – 4 grams or more – and carries mandatory minimum prison sentences, charged as a first-degree felony. Intent to sell isn’t required for a trafficking charge based on weight.

I didn’t know the drugs contained Fentanyl. Is that a defense?

Potentially, but it’s complex. Lack of knowledge can be a defense, but the prosecution may argue you knew you possessed an illicit substance, even if you didn’t know its exact composition. An attorney needs to evaluate the specific facts to see if this defense applies.

What does “mandatory minimum” really mean for Fentanyl trafficking?

It means if you are convicted of trafficking based on the weight thresholds (4g, 14g, or 28g+), the judge must sentence you to at least the minimum prison term specified by law (3, 15, or 25 years, respectively), often without the possibility of early release or gain time.

Can Fentanyl trafficking charges be reduced?

Possibly. An experienced attorney can negotiate with prosecutors, potentially highlighting weaknesses in the case, constitutional issues, or mitigating factors. Reduction might involve pleading to a lesser offense (like possession with intent) or, in rare cases, qualifying for a departure from the mandatory minimum through substantial assistance or specific statutory exceptions.

What if the Fentanyl wasn’t mine, but it was found in my car/house?

This relates to “constructive possession.” The prosecution must prove you knew the Fentanyl was there AND had dominion and control over it. If others had access, or if it was hidden without your knowledge, this can be a strong defense. We would fight to show the state cannot meet its burden of proof.

Should I talk to the police or detectives investigating my Fentanyl case?

Absolutely not without your attorney present. Police are trained to gather incriminating evidence. Anything you say can be twisted and used against you. Politely invoke your right to remain silent and your right to counsel. Call Casey Ebsary at 813-222-2220 immediately.

How much does it cost to hire an attorney for a Fentanyl case?

Legal fees vary depending on the complexity of the case (possession vs. trafficking, need for experts, potential for trial). We offer a confidential initial consultation to discuss your case and our fee structure, which often involves a flat fee for different stages of representation. Investing in a skilled private attorney is crucial given the severe potential penalties.

Can I get drug court for a Fentanyl charge in Hillsborough County?

Eligibility for drug court is often limited, especially for trafficking offenses or if you have a significant prior record. Simple possession cases may have a better chance. We can explore all diversionary programs and alternatives to incarceration for which you might qualify.

What happens at the first appearance/arraignment for a Fentanyl charge?

At the first appearance (usually within 24 hours of arrest), the judge determines probable cause and sets bond. At the arraignment, the formal charges are read, and you enter a plea (typically “not guilty” at this stage). Having an attorney present at these early stages is vital.

Why is hiring a local Hillsborough County attorney like Casey Ebsary important?

Local attorneys understand the specific procedures, personnel (judges, prosecutors, court staff), and unwritten rules of the Hillsborough County courthouse. This familiarity can be a significant advantage in navigating your case effectively, negotiating plea deals, and presenting your case at trial.

• Florida Marijuana Minimum Mandatory Law
• Florida Cocaine Minimum Mandatory Law
• Video – Hillsborough Marijuana Defense Lawyer 813-222-2220
• DRUG1300 POSSESSION OF COCAINE WITH INTENT TO SELL OR DISTRIBUTE
• Drug Sentences Slashed in Cocaine Cases

Take Action Now: Your Future Depends On It

A Fentanyl charge in Hillsborough County is not something to take lightly or delay addressing. The consequences of a conviction are life-altering. You need to act decisively to protect yourself.

Contact Casey the Lawyer Today for Immediate Help

Don’t wait for the prosecution to build its case against you. Reach out to W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. now. You can find detailed contact information, including an online form and office location, on our dedicated contact page: https://drug2go.com/contact-casey-the-lawyer/. Visiting this page is the first step towards getting the dedicated legal support you need. We offer confidential consultations to discuss the specifics of your situation, explain your rights, and outline how we can build a strong defense strategy tailored to your unique circumstances. Every moment counts when facing serious charges like Fentanyl possession or trafficking.

Call to Action: Protect Your Freedom – Call 813-222-2220

Your freedom, your reputation, and your future are on the line. Don’t gamble with inexperienced representation or try to navigate the complex legal system alone.

Call W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. right now at 813-222-2220.

We are available 24/7 to take your call. Schedule your confidential, no-obligation consultation today. Let us put our experience and knowledge of the Hillsborough County courts to work fighting for you.

Facing DRUG1904 Trafficking in Cocaine Charges (28-200g) in Hillsborough County?

You Need an Experienced Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney Immediately.

The term DRUG1904 is a specific code likely used by law enforcement and the court system in Hillsborough County, Florida, to categorize arrests and charges related to Trafficking in Cocaine involving quantities between 28 grams and 200 grams. While not part of the official statutory language itself (which is Florida Statute § 893.135(1)(b)1.a.), DRUG1904 serves as shorthand for this very serious first-degree felony charge. If you see DRUG1904 on arrest paperwork, charging documents, or court dockets in Hillsborough County, understand that it signifies you are accused of a crime carrying a possible mandatory minimum sentence of 3 years in prison and a $50,000 fine upon conviction.

If you or a loved one has been arrested and charged under the designation DRUG1904 TRAFFICKING IN COCAINE 28 TO 200 GRAMS in Hillsborough County, Florida, you are facing a severe first-degree felony with significant mandatory penalties. This is not a charge to take lightly. The time to act is now.

My name is W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., and I am a dedicated Tampa criminal defense attorney with extensive experience defending individuals against serious drug charges throughout Hillsborough County and the surrounding areas. I understand the fear and uncertainty that comes with a trafficking charge. My goal is to protect your rights, explore every possible defense, and fight for the best possible outcome in your case.

Don’t delay. Call me directly at 813-222-2220 for a confidential consultation to discuss your specific situation.

You can contact the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. tel:+18132222220 for a free consultation by calling 1-877-793-9290 or by filling out our online contact form. (https://drug2go.com/contact-casey-the-lawyer/).

Understanding the Charge: DRUG1904 – Trafficking in Cocaine (28g to <200g)

The designation DRUG1904 corresponds specifically to the charge of Trafficking in Cocaine, involving a quantity of 28 grams or more, but less than 200 grams, under Florida Statute § 893.135(1)(b)1.a. This statute outlines the serious nature of this offense.

Key Elements the Prosecution Must Prove:

To secure a conviction for DRUG1904 Trafficking in Cocaine (28g to <200g), the State Attorney’s Office must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. Knowledge: You knew the substance you possessed or handled was cocaine or a mixture containing cocaine.
2. Intent/Action: You knowingly sold, purchased, manufactured, delivered, brought into Florida, OR were in actual or constructive possession of the substance.
3. Quantity: The amount of cocaine, or the mixture containing cocaine, was 28 grams or more, but less than 200 grams.

What is “Actual” vs. “Constructive” Possession?

• Actual Possession: This means the cocaine was physically on your person (e.g., in your pocket, hand, or a bag you were carrying).
• Constructive Possession: This is more complex. It means the cocaine was not on your person but was in a place over which you had control (or shared control), and you knew it was there, and knew of its illicit nature. Examples include drugs found in your car’s glove box, under your bed, or in a shared living space. Proving constructive possession often requires the prosecution to show evidence linking you directly to the drugs beyond mere proximity. This is a frequent area where defenses can be mounted.

Florida Statute § 893.135(1)(b)1.a. – The Law:

The relevant portion of the Florida Statutes clearly states:

(1) Except as authorized in this chapter or in chapter 499 and notwithstanding the provisions of s. 893.13:

(b)1. Any person who knowingly sells, purchases, manufactures, delivers, or brings into this state, or who is knowingly in actual or constructive possession of, 28 grams or more of cocaine, as described in s. 893.03(2)(a)4., or of any mixture containing cocaine, but less than 150 kilograms [Note: the sub-section addresses the 200g limit] of cocaine or any such mixture, commits a felony of the first degree, which felony shall be known as “trafficking in cocaine,” punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

a. If the quantity involved: Is 28 grams or more, but less than 200 grams, such person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 3 years, and the defendant shall be ordered to pay a fine of $50,000.

You can review the full text of Florida Statute § 893.135 directly on the Florida Legislature’s official website: Florida Statute § 893.135 (Note: Always ensure you are viewing the most current version of the statute).

Severe Penalties for DRUG1904 Conviction in Florida

A conviction for DRUG1904 Trafficking in Cocaine (28g to <200g) carries mandatory minimum penalties:

• Mandatory Minimum Prison: Three (3) years in Florida State Prison. The judge must impose this sentence upon conviction unless specific legal exceptions apply (discussed below).
• Mandatory Minimum Fine: $50,000.

Beyond these mandatory minimums, a first-degree felony is punishable by:

• Up to thirty (30) years in prison.
• Up to $10,000 in additional fines (beyond the mandatory $50,000).
• Felony probation.

Long-Term Consequences:

A felony conviction for drug trafficking creates lifelong obstacles:

• Permanent Criminal Record: Making it difficult to find employment, secure housing, or obtain professional licenses.
• Loss of Civil Rights: Including the right to vote (until restored) and the right to own or possess firearms.
• Driver’s License Suspension: A conviction often triggers a mandatory suspension by the Florida DHSMV.
• Immigration Consequences: Non-citizens face potential deportation, denial of re-entry, or inability to obtain citizenship.
• Educational Opportunities: Difficulty getting accepted into colleges or receiving financial aid.
• Social Stigma: The label of “convicted drug trafficker” can have profound personal and social impacts.

Given these severe and life-altering consequences, mounting a vigorous defense is critical.

Defending Against DRUG1904 Cocaine Trafficking Charges

An arrest is not a conviction. There are numerous potential defense strategies that an experienced criminal defense attorney like myself can explore. Every case is unique, but common defenses in DRUG1904 cases include:

1. Illegal Search and Seizure: If law enforcement violated your Fourth Amendment rights during the search of your person, vehicle, or home, the evidence obtained (the cocaine) may be suppressed, potentially leading to dismissal. This involves scrutinizing the traffic stop, search warrant validity, or consent given. Explore more about your rights during searches on my website: drug2go.com.
2. Lack of Knowledge: The prosecution must prove you knew the substance was cocaine. If you were unaware of the drugs’ presence or their illicit nature (e.g., holding a package for someone else without knowing its contents), this can be a defense.
3. Lack of Possession (Actual or Constructive): Especially in constructive possession cases, we can challenge whether the state can prove you exercised dominion and control over the location where the drugs were found and knew they were there. Mere proximity to drugs is not enough for a conviction.
4. Insufficient Quantity: The state must prove the weight was 28 grams or more. We can challenge the weighing procedure, the calibration of the scales, or whether the entire mixture weight should count if it contains non-illicit substances.
5. Entrapment: If law enforcement induced you to commit a crime you otherwise would not have committed, this may be a defense.
6. Substantial Assistance: Florida law allows for potential avoidance or reduction of mandatory minimum sentences if a defendant provides “substantial assistance” in the identification, arrest, or conviction of other individuals involved in drug trafficking. This is a complex area requiring careful negotiation.
7. Misidentification: Challenging eyewitness accounts or confidential informant reliability.
8. Chain of Custody Issues: Challenging how the alleged drugs were handled, stored, and tested by law enforcement and the crime lab.

Developing the right defense strategy requires a thorough investigation of the facts, analysis of the police reports, witness interviews, and understanding of the specific procedures used by law enforcement agencies like the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office or the Tampa Police Department.

Understanding “DRUG1904” in Hillsborough County

Facing a DRUG1904 charge requires immediate action. Because DRUG1904 represents a high-level felony with mandatory penalties, securing experienced legal representation familiar with Hillsborough County courts and prosecutors is crucial. Defenses against DRUG1904 often involve challenging the legality of the stop or search, questioning the evidence of possession (especially constructive possession), disputing the weight or identity of the substance, or exploring potential mitigation strategies like substantial assistance. Do not underestimate the severity of a DRUG1904 designation; it demands a robust defense strategy from the outset. Contact W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. at 813-222-2220 immediately if you are facing a DRUG1904 charge in Hillsborough County.

Why Choose W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. for Your Defense?

When your freedom and future are on the line, you need an attorney who understands the stakes and knows how to navigate the complexities of the Florida criminal justice system, particularly within Hillsborough County.

• Experience: I have years of experience specifically prosecuting and defending serious drug trafficking cases like DRUG1904.
• Local Knowledge: Practicing extensively in Hillsborough County means I am familiar with the local courts, judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement procedures. This local insight is invaluable.
• Aggressive Representation: I am committed to fighting vigorously for my clients, challenging the prosecution’s case at every turn.
• Personalized Attention: You will work directly with me, Casey Ebsary. I ensure my clients understand the process and are involved in their defense strategy.
• Proven Results: While no attorney can guarantee an outcome, I have a track record of achieving favorable results for clients facing serious charges. Explore my main site for more information about my practice: drug2go.com.

Contact Casey Ebsary Today – Your First Step Towards Defense

If you or someone you know has been charged with DRUG1904 TRAFFICKING IN COCAINE 28 TO 200 GRAMS in Hillsborough County, the time to consult with an attorney is immediately. Do not speak to law enforcement without legal representation. Anything you say can be used against you.

Call me, W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., directly at 813-222-2220.

You can also reach out through my website. Please visit my Contact Casey the Lawyer page for more ways to get in touch. There you will find a secure contact form where you can provide details about your situation. Submitting information through the contact form or calling initiates a confidential consultation where we can discuss the specifics of your DRUG1904 charge and how I can help build your defense. Don’t wait for the prosecution to build its case – start your defense strategy now.

Frequently Asked Questions (Q&A) about DRUG1904 Cocaine Trafficking (28-200g)

What exactly is DRUG1904?

DRUG1904 is a code likely used by Hillsborough County law enforcement/courts for the charge of Trafficking in Cocaine (28g to <200g) under Florida Statute § 893.135(1)(b)1.a. It signifies a first-degree felony with mandatory penalties.

What are the mandatory minimum penalties for DRUG1904?

Upon conviction, the mandatory minimum sentence is 3 years in prison and a $50,000 fine.

Can I get bail if charged with DRUG1904?

Bail (bond) is possible but often set high for trafficking charges due to their severity. Factors include flight risk, community ties, and prior record. An attorney can argue for a reasonable bond at your first appearance hearing.

What if the drugs weren’t mine, but they were found in my car/house?

This involves the concept of “constructive possession.” The prosecution must prove you knew the drugs were there and had control over them. Simply being present isn’t enough. This is a critical area for defense.

Does the 3-year mandatory sentence mean I’ll only serve 3 years?

The 3-year sentence is the minimum the judge must impose upon conviction. The maximum sentence for this first-degree felony is 30 years. The actual sentence depends on many factors, but it cannot be less than 3 years without specific legal exceptions.

Can the charges be reduced or dismissed?

Yes, depending on the facts. Defenses like illegal searches, lack of evidence, or issues with proving possession or quantity can lead to reduced charges (e.g., simple possession) or complete dismissal. Negotiation or providing substantial assistance are other potential avenues.

What is “substantial assistance”?

This involves cooperating with law enforcement to help them investigate or prosecute others. If the State Attorney agrees you provided substantial assistance, they can request the judge waive or reduce the mandatory minimum sentence. This requires careful legal guidance.

Should I talk to the police if arrested for DRUG1904?

No. You have the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. Politely state that you wish to exercise these rights and do not answer any questions without your lawyer present. Anything you say can be used against you.

How much does it cost to hire an attorney for a DRUG1904 case?

Legal fees vary based on the complexity of the case. I offer a confidential initial consultation to discuss your case and my fees. Defending against a serious felony like trafficking is an investment in your future. Contact me at 813-222-2220 to discuss.

Why do I need a lawyer specializing in criminal defense for a DRUG1904 charge?

Drug trafficking laws are complex, the penalties are severe, and the procedures are specific. An experienced criminal defense attorney understands the nuances of the law, potential defenses, negotiation strategies, and the local court system (especially Hillsborough County). This specialized knowledge is essential for protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome.

• Florida Cocaine Minimum Mandatory Law
• Trafficking in Cocaine | Florida Conviction Overturned
• Video – Hillsborough Marijuana Defense Lawyer 813-222-2220
• Florida Marijuana Minimum Mandatory Law
• Prescription Drugs

Drug2Go.com

2102 W Cleveland St
Tampa, Florida 33606
Phone: 813-222-2220
Email: centrallaw@gmail.com

Cocaine Trafficking 28 – 200 Grams

If you have been charged with DRUG1904 TRAFFICKING IN COCAINE 28 TO 200 GRAMS you can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Attorney at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.

Form Code: DRUG1904
Florida Statute: 893.135.1B1A
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 1st

Description: TRAFFICKING IN COCAINE 28 TO 200 GRAMS
DRUG1904 TRAFFICKING IN COCAINE 28 TO 200 GRAMS is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.
Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 893 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

893.135 Trafficking; mandatory sentences; suspension or reduction of sentences; conspiracy to engage in trafficking.

(1) Except as authorized in this chapter or in chapter 499 and notwithstanding the provisions of s. 893.13:

(b)1. Any person who knowingly sells, purchases, manufactures, delivers, or brings into this state, or who is knowingly in actual or constructive possession of, 28 grams or more of cocaine, as described in s. 893.03(2)(a)4., or of any mixture containing cocaine, but less than 150 kilograms of cocaine or any such mixture, commits a felony of the first degree, which felony shall be known as “trafficking in cocaine,” punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. If the quantity involved:

a. Is 28 grams or more, but less than 200 grams, such person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 3 years, and the defendant shall be ordered to pay a fine of $50,000.


Florida Standard Jury Instruction:

25.11 TRAFFICKING IN ILLEGAL DRUGS

§ 893.135(1)(c), Fla. Stat.

            Certain drugs and chemical substances are by law known as “controlled substances.” (Specific substance alleged) or any mixture containing (specific substance alleged) is a controlled substance.

            To prove the crime of Trafficking in Illegal Drugs, the State must prove the following four elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

            1.         (Defendant) knowingly

                                    [sold]

                                    [purchased]

                                    [manufactured]

                                    [delivered]

                                    [brought into Florida]

                                    [possessed]

                        a certain substance.

2.         The substance was [morphine] [opium] [oxycodone] [hydrocodone] [hydromorphone] [heroin] [(specific substance alleged)] [a mixture containing [morphine] [opium] [oxycodone] [hydrocodone] [hydromorphone] [herion] [(specific substance alleged)]].

3.         The quantity of the substance involved was 4 grams or more.

            See State v. Dominguez, 509 So. 2d 917 (Fla. 1987).

4.         (Defendant) knew that the substance was [[morphine] [opium] [oxycodone] [hydrocodone] [hydromorphone] [heroin] [(specific substance alleged)] [a mixture containing [morphine] [opium] [oxycodone] [hydrocodone] [hydromorphone] [heroin] [(specific substance alleged)]].

            If applicable under the facts of the case and pursuant to § 893.135(2), Fla. Stat., the following bracketed language should be given instead of element 4 above.  For example, if it is alleged that the defendant intended to sell heroin but actually sold (specific substance alleged), the alternate element 4 would be given.

[4.        (Defendant) intended to [sell] [purchase] [manufacture] [deliver] [bring into Florida] [possess] (an enumerated controlled substance in § 893.135(1), Fla. Stat.), but actually [sold] [purchased] [manufactured] [delivered] [brought into Florida] [possessed] (specific substance alleged) or a mixture containing (specific substance alleged).]

            Definitions.  Give as applicable.

            Sell.

            “Sell” means to transfer or deliver something to another person in exchange for money or something of value or a promise of money or something of value.

            Manufacture.  § 893.02(13)(a), Fla. Stat.

            “Manufacture” means the production, preparation, packaging, labeling or relabeling, propagation, compounding, cultivating, growing, conversion or processing of a controlled substance, either directly or indirectly.  Manufacturing can be by extraction from substances of natural origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis. It can also be by a combination of extraction and chemical synthesis.

            Deliver.  § 893.02(5), Fla. Stat.

            “Deliver” or “delivery” means the actual, constructive, or attempted transfer from one person to another of a controlled substance, whether or not there is an agency relationship.

            Possession.

            To “possess” means to have personal charge of or exercise the right of ownership, management, or control over the thing possessed.

            Possession may be actual or constructive.

            Actual possession means:

a.         The controlled substance is in the hand of or on the person, or

b.         The controlled substance is in a container in the hand of or on the person, or

c.         The controlled substance is so close as to be within ready reach and is under the control of the person.

            Give if applicable.

            Mere proximity to a controlled substance is not sufficient to establish control over that controlled substance when it is not in a place over which the person has control.

            Constructive possession means the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) has control, or in which the (defendant) has concealed it.

            In order to establish constructive possession of a controlled substance if the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) does not have control, the State must prove the (defendant’s) (1) control over the controlled substance and (2) knowledge that the controlled substance was within the (defendant’s) presence.

            Possession may be joint, that is, two or more persons may jointly possess an article, exercising control over it. In that case, each of those persons is considered to be in possession of that article.

            If a person has exclusive possession of a controlled substance, knowledge of its presence may be inferred or assumed.

            If a person does not have exclusive possession of a controlled substance, knowledge of its presence may not be inferred or assumed.

            Knowledge of the illicit nature of the controlled substance.  Give if applicable.  § 893.101(2) and (3), Fla. Stat.

            Knowledge of the illicit nature of the controlled substance is not an element of the offense of (insert name of offense charged).  Lack of knowledge of the illicit nature of a controlled substance is an affirmative defense.  (Defendant) has raised this affirmative defense.  However, you are permitted to presume that (defendant) was aware of the illicit nature of the controlled substance if you find that (defendant) was in actual or constructive possession of the controlled substance.

            If from the evidence you are convinced that (defendant) knew of the illicit nature of the controlled substance, and all of the elements of the charge have been proved, you should find (defendant) guilty.

            If you have a reasonable doubt on the question of whether (defendant) knew of the illicit nature of the controlled substance, you should find (defendant) not guilty.

            See State v. Weller, 590 So. 2d 923 (Fla. 1991).

            If you find the defendant guilty of Trafficking in Illegal Drugs, you must further determine by your verdict whether the State has proved beyond a reasonable doubt that:

            Enhanced penalty.  Give if applicable up to extent of charge.

a.         [The quantity of the substance involved was 4 grams or more but less than 14 grams.]

b.         [The quantity of the substance involved was 14 grams or more but less than 28 grams.]

c.         [The quantity of the substance involved was 28 grams or more but less than 30 kilograms.]

d.         [The quantity of the substance involved was 30 kilograms or more.]

Lesser Included Offenses

Comment

This instruction was adopted in 1981 and amended in 1985 [477 So. 2d 985], 1987 [509 So. 2d 917], 1989 [543 So. 2d 1205], 1997 [697 So. 2d 84], and 2007 [969 So. 2d 245].  See also SC03-629 [869 So. 2d 1205 (Fla. 2004)].

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Facing DRUG1300 Charges in Hillsborough County? Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell Defense (Updated for 2025)

An arrest for Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell or Distribute in Florida, often logged under the code DRUG1300 in Hillsborough County criminal records, is a charge that demands immediate and serious attention. This is not a minor offense; it’s a felony that carries the potential for lengthy imprisonment, crippling fines, and a permanent mark on your record that can derail your future prospects for employment, housing, professional licenses, and even basic civil rights like voting or owning a firearm.

If you or someone you know is facing a DRUG1300 charge in Tampa, Plant City, or anywhere within Hillsborough County, you are likely feeling overwhelmed, scared, and uncertain about what comes next. The State Attorney’s Office prosecutes drug crimes aggressively. You need a defense attorney who understands the specific nuances of Florida drug law as outlined in the official statutes, knows the local court system, and is prepared to fight vigorously to protect your rights and your future.

My name is W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., and I am a Tampa-based criminal defense attorney. For years, I have dedicated my practice to defending individuals against serious felony charges, including Possession with Intent to Sell Cocaine (DRUG1300). I understand the stakes are high, and I am committed to providing a strategic, aggressive defense tailored to the specific facts of your case.

Don’t face the power of the State alone. Call me, Casey Ebsary, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at 813-222-2220 for a free, confidential consultation to discuss your DRUG1300 charge.

Understanding Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell (DRUG1300) Under Florida Law

The core statute governing this offense is Florida Statute § 893.13(1)(a) This law explicitly states that, except as authorized, it is unlawful for any person to “sell, manufacture, or deliver, or possess with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver, a controlled substance.”

Cocaine is explicitly listed as a Schedule II controlled substance under Florida Statute § 893.03(2)(a)4. While simple possession of cocaine is itself a felony, the allegation that you intended to sell, manufacture, or deliver it significantly increases the severity of the charge and the potential penalties.

What the Prosecution Must Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt:

For the Hillsborough County State Attorney to secure a conviction for Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell (DRUG1300) under F.S. § 893.13(1)(a), they carry the burden of proving all of the following elements:

1. Knowing Possession: The accused knowingly had possession of the substance. Possession can be:
   • Actual Possession: The substance was found on the person’s body, in their hand, or in a container in their hand or pocket – essentially, within immediate physical control.
   • Constructive Possession: The substance was not on the person but was located in a place over which the accused exercised dominion and control (e.g., their car, their room), the accused knew the substance was present, and the accused knew of the illicit nature of the substance. Proving constructive possession can be complex, especially if multiple people had access to the location where the drugs were found.
2. Identification of Substance: The substance possessed was, in fact, cocaine. This typically requires chemical analysis by a state crime lab.
3. Intent to Sell, Manufacture, or Deliver: The accused possessed the cocaine not merely for personal use, but with the specific purpose of distributing it to others. This is often the most heavily contested element in DRUG1300 cases.

Inferring “Intent to Sell”: How Prosecutors Build Their Case

Direct evidence of intent to sell (like a recorded confession or a witnessed sale) is uncommon. Therefore, prosecutors typically rely on circumstantial evidence to convince a judge or jury of the accused’s intent. Common factors they point to include:

• Quantity of Cocaine: Possessing an amount larger than what is typically considered for personal use (though Florida Statute § 893.135 establishes specific trafficking weights starting at 28 grams, even amounts less than this can be argued as intent to sell based on other factors).
• Packaging: Cocaine divided into multiple, smaller, individually wrapped packages (e.g., small baggies, vials) consistent with street-level sales.
• Presence of Drug Paraphernalia Associated with Sales: Items like digital scales, cutting agents (substances used to dilute cocaine), ledgers or records documenting transactions, and large sums of cash, especially in small denominations.
• Absence of User Paraphernalia: The lack of items typically associated with personal cocaine consumption (like pipes, straws, or rolled bills).
• Location: The arrest taking place in an area known by law enforcement for high drug trafficking activity.
• Statements/Communications: Text messages, phone calls, or statements overheard by officers or witnesses that suggest drug dealing.
• Firearms: The presence of firearms alongside the drugs can sometimes be used to imply protection of a drug-selling operation.

A skilled defense attorney scrutinizes each piece of circumstantial evidence the State presents, challenging its interpretation and presenting alternative, innocent explanations where applicable to combat the allegation of intent.

Penalties for Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell in Florida (as of 2025)

According to Florida Statute § 893.13(1)(a)1, Possession of Cocaine (as a Schedule II substance under F.S. 893.03) with Intent to Sell, Manufacture, or Deliver is classified as a Felony of the Second Degree. Per Florida’s general sentencing statutes F.S. § 775.082 and F.S. § 775.083 , potential penalties include:

• Prison: A term of imprisonment not exceeding fifteen (15) years.
• Probation: Up to fifteen (15) years of supervised probation.
• Fines: A fine not exceeding $10,000.
• Driver’s License Suspension: A mandatory minimum 6-month suspension/revocation of driving privileges upon conviction, pursuant to Florida Statute § 322.055 .
• Permanent Felony Record: A felony conviction carries significant lifelong consequences, affecting rights and opportunities regarding employment, housing, firearm ownership, voting, and professional licensing.

Aggravating Factors Leading to Harsher Penalties:

Florida law specifies circumstances that can significantly increase the severity of the charge and potential penalties:

• Proximity to Specific Locations: Under F.S. § 893.13(1)(c)-(f) , committing the offense (selling, manufacturing, delivering, or possessing with intent) within 1,000 feet of a school (between 6 a.m. and midnight), childcare facility, park, community center, place of worship, assisted living facility, public housing facility, or college/university elevates the crime to a Felony of the First Degree.
  • A first-degree felony is punishable by up to thirty (30) years in prison (F.S. § 775.082(3)(b), and a fine of up to $10,000 .
  • Certain offenses under this subsection, particularly near schools or childcare facilities, carry mandatory minimum prison sentences of 3 years.
• Prior Convictions (Habitual Offender Laws): If you have prior felony convictions, the State may seek enhanced penalties under Florida Statute § 775.084 . Depending on the nature and timing of previous convictions, you could face significantly longer prison sentences and potential mandatory minimum terms as a Habitual Felony Offender (HFO) or Habitual Violent Felony Offender (HVFO).
• Trafficking Thresholds: Possessing 28 grams or more of cocaine or any mixture containing cocaine automatically triggers Florida’s harsh drug trafficking laws F.S. § 893.135, . This is a separate, more serious first-degree felony charge carrying mandatory minimum prison sentences and extremely high fines, regardless of actual intent to sell:
  • 28g to < 200g: Minimum 3 years prison + $50,000 fine.
  • 200g to < 400g: Minimum 7 years prison + $100,000 fine.
  • 400g to < 150kg: Minimum 15 years prison + $250,000 fine.

Important Note on Sentencing: Florida uses a Criminal Punishment Code (CPC) scoresheet to guide sentencing. Factors like the primary offense level, additional offenses, victim injury (rare in these cases but possible), and the defendant’s prior record generate points. A certain point threshold mandates a state prison sentence unless the judge finds grounds for a downward departure. An experienced attorney understands the scoresheet system and can argue for mitigating factors or departure grounds.

Understanding the Charge Code: DRUG1300

If you or a loved one has been arrested in Hillsborough County and reviewed the arrest affidavit or court documents, you might encounter the specific designation DRUG1300. What exactly does this alphanumeric code signify? DRUG1300 is an internal code frequently utilized by law enforcement agencies and the court system within Hillsborough County (and potentially neighboring jurisdictions) to specifically categorize the charge of Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell, Manufacture, or Deliver. It corresponds directly to the offense outlined in Florida Statute § 893.13(1)(a) when the controlled substance involved is cocaine, classified under Schedule II.

While “DRUG1300” isn’t part of the official statutory language itself, it acts as a critical shorthand for police, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and court clerks navigating the criminal justice system. Seeing DRUG1300 on paperwork confirms that the State is alleging more than simple possession; they believe they have evidence indicating an intent to distribute. Understanding this code helps clarify the precise nature and severity of the charge you are facing—a second-degree felony with significant potential penalties.

Therefore, searching for defenses against a DRUG1300 charge means seeking effective legal strategies to combat allegations of Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell within the specific context of the Hillsborough County legal environment. Given the serious consequences linked to DRUG1300, prompt action is essential. At the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., we are familiar with how DRUG1300 cases are handled locally and are prepared to build a robust defense. If this code appears in your case, contact us immediately at 813-222-2220.

You can contact the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. tel:+18132222220 for a free consultation by calling 1-877-793-9290 or by filling out our online contact form. (https://drug2go.com/contact-casey-the-lawyer/).

Potential Defenses to Possession of Cocaine with Intent (DRUG1300)

Just because you’ve been arrested doesn’t mean you will be convicted. A knowledgeable criminal defense attorney can identify and assert various defenses to challenge a DRUG1300 charge. Some potential avenues include:

• Illegal Search and Seizure: The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches. If police stopped your vehicle without reasonable suspicion, searched your home without a valid warrant (or a valid exception to the warrant requirement), or otherwise violated your constitutional rights, the cocaine and any other evidence seized might be suppressed. A successful motion to suppress can gut the prosecution’s case.
• Lack of Possession (Actual or Constructive): Can the State definitively link the cocaine to you?
  • Constructive Possession Challenges: If drugs were found in a car with passengers, a shared apartment, or another area where multiple people had access, the State must prove you had knowledge of the drugs’ presence and the ability to exercise dominion and control over them. Mere proximity is often insufficient.
  • Actual Possession Challenges: Was the item truly “on your person”? Was the discovery procedure lawful?
• Lack of Knowledge: The State must prove you knew the substance was cocaine. If you reasonably believed it was something else, or if it was hidden in your belongings by someone else without your awareness, this could be a defense.
• No Intent to Sell: This is frequently the core battleground. Arguments can include:
  • The quantity possessed was consistent with personal use, not distribution.
  • Lack of typical distribution indicators (no scales, baggies, large cash amounts, ledgers, incriminating messages).
  • Evidence of personal use (presence of user paraphernalia).
• Problems with the Evidence:
  • Chain of Custody: Any breaks or inconsistencies in how the alleged cocaine was handled, stored, and transported from seizure to the lab can cast doubt on its integrity.
  • Lab Testing: Challenging the methodology or results of the crime lab’s analysis. Was the substance definitively identified as cocaine? Was the weight accurate (especially crucial near trafficking thresholds)?
• Entrapment: If law enforcement officers or their agents improperly induced or persuaded you to commit a crime that you were not otherwise predisposed to commit.
• Issues with Confidential Informants (CIs): Cases built on CI testimony are often vulnerable. A defense attorney will investigate the CI’s reliability, motivation (deals for testimony?), and potential biases, as well as whether police properly corroborated the CI’s information.
• Florida’s 911 Good Samaritan Act F.S. § 893.21, This law provides limited immunity from arrest, charging, and prosecution for certain possession offenses (and paraphernalia) for individuals who, acting in good faith, seek medical assistance for someone (including themselves) experiencing a drug or alcohol overdose. Eligibility depends on specific circumstances.

Developing the right defense strategy requires a detailed analysis of your unique case facts. I will explore every possible angle. Visit my website for more general information on drug crime defense.

Potential Resolutions Beyond Trial

While preparing a robust defense for trial is crucial, many cases are resolved before reaching a jury. Depending on the specific facts, the strength of the evidence, your criminal history, and negotiation, potential alternative resolutions include:

• Dismissal of Charges: If critical evidence is suppressed due to constitutional violations, or if the prosecution cannot meet its burden of proof, charges may be dismissed outright or dropped via a “nolle prosequi.”
• Reduced Charges: Negotiating a plea agreement where you plead guilty or no contest to a less serious offense, such as simple Possession of Cocaine (a third-degree felony) or even misdemeanor paraphernalia, resulting in lesser penalties.
• Pre-Trial Intervention (PTI) or Drug Court: For eligible individuals (often first-time offenders or those with limited prior records), these diversion programs focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment. Successful completion typically leads to the dismissal of the charges. Admission usually requires approval from the State Attorney’s Office.
• Withholding Adjudication: In some plea agreements, the judge may agree to withhold adjudication of guilt. While you still face penalties (like probation), avoiding a formal felony conviction can prevent the loss of certain civil rights and may be less damaging for future employment or licensing.
• Probation: A sentence involving supervision in the community instead of prison, often with conditions like drug testing, counseling, community service, and fines.

Why You Need W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. for Your Hillsborough County DRUG1300 Defense

Facing a felony drug charge like Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell demands experienced legal counsel familiar with local practices. Here’s why you should consider my firm:

• Local Hillsborough County Experience: I practice regularly in the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court in Tampa. I am familiar with the local State Attorney’s office policies, the judges, and the specific procedures used in Hillsborough County drug cases.
• Deep Knowledge of Florida Drug Laws: I was a Hillsborough County Drug Prosecutor and constantly monitor changes in statutes, case law (court decisions), and sentencing guidelines relevant to drug offenses.
• Aggressive & Strategic Defense: I believe in a proactive defense. I will thoroughly investigate the State’s case, identify weaknesses, file appropriate motions (like Motions to Suppress or Dismiss), and aggressively advocate for your rights, whether in negotiations or in the courtroom.
• Direct Attorney Contact: When you hire my firm, you work directly with me, Casey Ebsary. I prioritize clear communication, ensuring you understand the legal process, your options, and the status of your case.
• Focus on Favorable Outcomes: My goal is always to achieve the best possible result for you, whether that means fighting for a complete dismissal, negotiating a significantly reduced charge, securing entry into a diversion program, or winning an acquittal at trial.
• Available 24/7: I understand that legal emergencies require immediate attention. My phone line (813-222-2220) is open 24/7.

Frequently Asked Questions (Q&A) about Possession of Cocaine with Intent (DRUG1300)

What’s the main difference between simple possession and DRUG1300 in Florida?

Simple possession (usually a 3rd-degree felony) is possessing cocaine for personal use. DRUG1300 (Possession with Intent, a 2nd-degree felony) requires the State to prove you intended to sell, make, or deliver it. Penalties are much higher for DRUG1300.

Can I be charged with intent (DRUG1300) even if I didn’t actually sell anything?

Yes. The charge is based on intent, not a completed sale. Prosecutors use circumstantial evidence (quantity, packaging, scales, etc.) to try and prove that intent.

What if the cocaine wasn’t mine or I didn’t know it was in my car/house?

This involves defenses like Lack of Knowledge or challenging Constructive Possession. The State must prove you knew about the drugs and had control over them. If multiple people had access, it complicates the State’s case.

Is there a specific amount of cocaine that automatically triggers a DRUG1300 charge?

Below the 28-gram trafficking threshold, there’s no set amount. Any quantity can support an intent charge if other factors (packaging, scales) are present. However, larger amounts make the State’s argument easier.

What if police found scales or baggies but only a small amount of cocaine?

Police will likely still charge DRUG1300 based on the paraphernalia. However, a defense attorney can argue the amount is consistent with personal use and challenge the inference of intent based solely on the items.

Does a DRUG1300 conviction always mean prison?

Not automatically, unless mandatory minimums apply (e.g., trafficking weight, gun enhancement, certain location enhancements under F.S. § 893.13. However, as a 2nd-degree felony scoring under the Criminal Punishment Code, prison is a significant risk, especially with a prior record. Your attorney’s goal is to avoid prison through dismissal, acquittal, reduced charges, or alternative sentencing.

What are the first things I should do if arrested for DRUG1300?

Politely but firmly state you wish to remain silent and want an attorney. Do not answer police questions, consent to searches, or make any statements without counsel present. Contact W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. at 813-222-2220 immediately.

Can Casey Ebsary get my DRUG1300 charge reduced or dismissed?

While no attorney can guarantee results, my goal is always to seek the best possible outcome. This often involves fighting for dismissal via motions, negotiating favorable plea deals to lesser charges (like simple possession), or securing acquittal at trial. Success depends on the specific facts and evidence.

How does “constructive possession” work in Florida?

It applies when drugs aren’t on your person. The State must prove (1) you knew the drugs were there, (2) you knew they were illegal, and (3) you had “dominion and control” over the place where they were found (e.g., your car, your bedroom).

Will a DRUG1300 charge suspend my driver’s license?

Yes. If adjudication is not with held, Under F.S. § 322.055 any conviction for a drug offense, including DRUG1300, results in a mandatory minimum 6-month driver’s license revocation by the Florida DHSMV.

Don’t Delay – Protect Your Future Today

A charge of Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell or Distribute (DRUG1300) in Hillsborough County is a serious legal battle with potentially devastating consequences. You need a defense lawyer who will stand by your side, fight for your rights, and pursue every legal avenue to protect your freedom and future.

Do not wait. Evidence can disappear, witness memories can fade, and the prosecution is already building its case. The sooner you have an experienced attorney involved, the stronger your defense can be.

Call the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. right now at 813-222-2220. We are available 24/7 to take your call and provide a free, confidential consultation.

Contact Us for a Confidential Consultation

If you prefer to reach out online, please visit our dedicated contact page. You can send a secure message detailing your situation, and we will get back to you promptly. We understand the sensitive nature of these charges and assure you of complete confidentiality. Find our contact form and other contact details here.

Legal Citations (Official Florida Statutes Links):

• Florida Statute § 893.13 (Prohibited acts; penalties):
• Florida Statute § 893.03 (Controlled substance schedules):
• Florida Statute § 893.135 (Trafficking offenses):
• Florida Statute § 775.082 (Penalties; imprisonment):
• Florida Statute § 775.083 (Penalties; fines):
• Florida Statute § 775.084 (Habitual felony offenders):
• Florida Statute § 322.055 (Driver’s license suspension for drug offenses):
• Florida Statute § 893.21 (Drug-related overdose; medical assistance immunity):

Possession Cocaine Intent Distribute

If you have been charged with DRUG1300 POSSESSION OF COCAINE WITH INTENT TO SELL OR D (Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell or Distribute) you can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.

Form Code: DRUG1300
Florida Statute: 893.13.1A
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 2nd
Description: POSSESSION OF COCAINE WITH INTENT TO SELL OR D (Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell or Distribute)

DRUG1300 POSSESSION OF COCAINE WITH INTENT TO SELL OR D (Possession of Cocaine with Intent to Sell or Distribute) one of the most commonly charged offenses in Hillsborough County, Florida.

Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 893 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

893.13 Prohibited acts; penalties.

(1)(a) Except as authorized by this chapter and chapter 499, it is unlawful for any person to sell, manufacture, or deliver, or possess with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver, a controlled substance. Any person who violates this provision with respect to:

1. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c)4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

2. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(c), (2)(c)1., (2)(c)2., (2)(c)3., (2)(c)5., (2)(c)6., (2)(c)7., (2)(c)8., (2)(c)9., (3), or (4) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

3. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(5) commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

(b) Except as provided in this chapter, it is unlawful to sell or deliver in excess of 10 grams of any substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a) or (1)(b), or any combination thereof, or any mixture containing any such substance. Any person who violates this paragraph commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

(c) Except as authorized by this chapter, it is unlawful for any person to sell, manufacture, or deliver, or possess with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver, a controlled substance in, on, or within 1,000 feet of the real property comprising a child care facility as defined in s. 402.302 or a public or private elementary, middle, or secondary school between the hours of 6 a.m. and 12 midnight, or at any time in, on, or within 1,000 feet of real property comprising a state, county, or municipal park, a community center, or a publicly owned recreational facility. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term “community center” means a facility operated by a nonprofit community-based organization for the provision of recreational, social, or educational services to the public. Any person who violates this paragraph with respect to:

1. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c)4., commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. The defendant must be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of 3 calendar years unless the offense was committed within 1,000 feet of the real property comprising a child care facility as defined in s. 402.302.

2. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(c), (2)(c)1., (2)(c)2., (2)(c)3., (2)(c)5., (2)(c)6., (2)(c)7., (2)(c)8., (2)(c)9., (3), or (4) commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

3. Any other controlled substance, except as lawfully sold, manufactured, or delivered, must be sentenced to pay a $500 fine and to serve 100 hours of public service in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law.

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Facing a criminal charge can be a daunting experience, especially when it involves serious allegations like the delivery of cocaine. In Florida, this charge, often coded as “DRUG1200,” carries significant penalties and can have long-lasting consequences. This article provides a comprehensive overview of Florida Statute 893.13(1)(a), which governs this offense, and explains what you need to know if you or a loved one is facing this charge.

It’s important to remember that DRUG1200 is just one of many ways to face drug-related charges in Hillsborough County. In fact, there are over 250 ways to go to jail for drug crimes in Florida, highlighting the complexity and breadth of Florida’s drug laws. For immediate assistance, you can contact us at 813-222-2220.

What is DRUG1200 Delivery of Cocaine?

DRUG1200 is the Florida charge for the delivery of cocaine. It falls under Florida Statute 893.13(1)(a), which prohibits the sale, manufacture, or delivery, or possession with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver, a controlled substance. Cocaine is classified as a Schedule II controlled substance, meaning it has a high potential for abuse and a severely restricted medical use.

The Broad Scope of “Delivery”

It’s crucial to understand that “delivery” in this context doesn’t just mean a direct, hand-to-hand transaction. Florida law defines delivery broadly to include:

• Actual Delivery: The physical transfer of the drug.
• Constructive Delivery: Having the intent and ability to control the cocaine, even without physically handing it over. This could involve directing someone to a hidden stash.
• Attempted Delivery: Even an unsuccessful attempt to deliver cocaine can result in charges.

This broad definition means you can be charged with DRUG1200 even if you weren’t directly involved in a physical exchange. See more details on our DRUG1200 Delivery of Cocaine page.

Penalties for DRUG1200

As a second-degree felony, DRUG1200 carries severe penalties under Florida law:

• Prison: Up to 15 years in prison, as outlined in Florida Statute 775.082.
• Fines: Up to $10,000 in fines, as per Florida Statute 775.083.
• Habitual Offender Status: If you have prior felony convictions, you could face significantly enhanced penalties, including a potential life sentence, under Florida Statute 775.084.

Enhancements and Aggravating Factors

Certain factors can increase the severity of the charge:

• Quantity: Selling or delivering over 10 grams elevates the charge to a first-degree felony (up to 30 years in prison), according to Florida Statute 893.13(1)(b).
• Proximity to Protected Locations: Selling, manufacturing, or delivering within 1,000 feet of schools, childcare facilities, parks, community centers, or public recreational facilities (between 6 a.m. and midnight for schools) also elevates the charge to a first-degree felony with a mandatory minimum 3-year prison sentence, as detailed in Florida Statute 893.13(1)(c).

Potential Defenses

While a DRUG1200 charge is serious, there are potential defenses. A skilled criminal defense attorney will explore all options, which may include:

• Lack of Knowledge: The prosecution must prove you knowingly possessed or delivered the cocaine.
• Lack of Intent: For constructive delivery or possession with intent, the prosecution must prove your intent.
• Illegal Search and Seizure: Evidence obtained illegally may be suppressed.
• Entrapment: If law enforcement induced you to commit a crime you wouldn’t have otherwise committed.
• Mistaken Identity: If you were wrongly identified.
• Substantial Assistance: You may be able to work with law enforcement.

Why You Need an Experienced Attorney

The complexities of Florida drug laws, as evidenced by the numerous ways to be charged with drug crimes, the broad definition of “delivery,” and the potential for severe penalties make it essential to have experienced legal representation. At the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., we understand the seriousness of these charges and are dedicated to protecting your rights. We will thoroughly investigate your case, explore all possible defenses, and fight for the best possible outcome.

FAQ: DRUG1200 Delivery of Cocaine

Here are some frequently asked questions about DRUG1200 charges:

What if I didn’t actually sell the cocaine, but I was just holding it for someone else?

You could still be charged with possession with intent to deliver, which carries the same penalties as actual delivery. This falls under the concept of constructive possession.

What if I was just in the wrong place at the wrong time?

Mere presence at the scene of a crime is not enough to convict you. However, the prosecution may try to prove your involvement through other evidence. It’s crucial to have an attorney review the evidence against you.

Can the police search my car without a warrant?

The police can search your car without a warrant under certain circumstances, such as if they have probable cause to believe it contains evidence of a crime. However, these searches are subject to legal challenges. An illegal search could lead to the suppression of evidence.

What is a mandatory minimum sentence?

A mandatory minimum sentence is a minimum prison term that a judge must impose, regardless of mitigating circumstances. The 3-year mandatory minimum for selling near protected locations is an example.

What does “constructive delivery” mean?

Constructive delivery means you have the intent and ability to control the drugs, even if you don’t physically hand them to someone.

What if I was set up by a confidential informant?

This could potentially be a defense of entrapment, but entrapment is a complex legal issue. It’s not enough to simply be given the opportunity to commit a crime; the police must have induced you to do something you wouldn’t have otherwise done.

What is “substantial assistance”?

Providing substantial assistance to law enforcement in the investigation or prosecution of other drug offenses can sometimes lead to a reduced sentence. This is a strategic decision that should be discussed with your attorney.

What are the long-term consequences of a DRUG1200 conviction?

Beyond prison and fines, a felony conviction can impact your ability to get a job, housing, professional licenses, and even vote.

What should I do if I’m arrested for DRUG1200?

Exercise your right to remain silent and contact an attorney immediately. Do not answer any questions without legal counsel.

How can I contact your firm for help?

You can call us at 813-222-2220 or contact our website at drug2go.com for a consultation. We are here to help you navigate this challenging situation.

You can contact the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. tel:+18132222220 for a free consultation by calling 1-877-793-9290 or by filling out our online contact form. (https://drug2go.com/contact-casey-the-lawyer/).

If you have been charged with DRUG1200 DELIVERY OF COCAINE you can call a Tampa Criminal Defense Lawyer at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.

Form Code: DRUG1200


Florida Statute: 893.13.1A
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 2nd

Description: DELIVERY OF COCAINE

DRUG1200 DELIVERY OF COCAINE one of the most commonly charged offenses in Hillsborough County, Florida.

Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 893 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL
893.13 Prohibited acts; penalties.
(1)(a) Except as authorized by this chapter and chapter 499, it is unlawful for any person to sell, manufacture, or deliver, or possess with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver, a controlled substance. Any person who violates this provision with respect to:
1. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c)4., commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
2. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(c), (2)(c)1., (2)(c)2., (2)(c)3., (2)(c)5., (2)(c)6., (2)(c)7., (2)(c)8., (2)(c)9., (3), or (4) commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
3. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(5) commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.
(b) Except as provided in this chapter, it is unlawful to sell or deliver in excess of 10 grams of any substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a) or (1)(b), or any combination thereof, or any mixture containing any such substance. Any person who violates this paragraph commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
(c) Except as authorized by this chapter, it is unlawful for any person to sell, manufacture, or deliver, or possess with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver, a controlled substance in, on, or within 1,000 feet of the real property comprising a child care facility as defined in s. 402.302 or a public or private elementary, middle, or secondary school between the hours of 6 a.m. and 12 midnight, or at any time in, on, or within 1,000 feet of real property comprising a state, county, or municipal park, a community center, or a publicly owned recreational facility. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term “community center” means a facility operated by a nonprofit community-based organization for the provision of recreational, social, or educational services to the public. Any person who violates this paragraph with respect to:
1. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c)4., commits a felony of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. The defendant must be sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of 3 calendar years unless the offense was committed within 1,000 feet of the real property comprising a child care facility as defined in s. 402.302.
2. A controlled substance named or described in s. 893.03(1)(c), (2)(c)1., (2)(c)2., (2)(c)3., (2)(c)5., (2)(c)6., (2)(c)7., (2)(c)8., (2)(c)9., (3), or (4) commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
3. Any other controlled substance, except as lawfully sold, manufactured, or delivered, must be sentenced to pay a $500 fine and to serve 100 hours of public service in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law.
Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Do you need a Drug Crimes Attorney? Facing drug charges in Florida can be overwhelming. The potential penalties are severe, and the legal landscape is complex. Choosing the right attorney is one of the most critical decisions you’ll make, directly impacting the outcome of your case. This page isn’t just about finding any lawyer; it’s about finding the right lawyer. We’ll guide you through key questions to ask, explain the importance of Florida Bar Board Certification in Criminal Trial Law, and provide expert tips to help you make an informed decision, including how to verify a lawyer’s credentials. Let’s get started.

According To The Florida Bar, Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyers Are Specialists.

Drug Crimes Attorney and criminal defense expert, Casey Ebsary knows that facing drug crime charges in Florida is a serious matter. The outcome of your case can have a lasting impact on your life. When choosing a lawyer, one crucial factor to consider is whether the attorney is a Board Certified Specialist in Criminal Trial Law. This article explains what board certification means and why it’s important for your defense.

What is Board Certification?

According To The Florida Bar, Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyers are considered specialists. Board certification is a voluntary program for Florida lawyers, administered by The Florida Bar’s Board of Legal Specialization & Education (BLSE). It represents the highest level of evaluation by The Florida Bar regarding a lawyer’s competency and experience within a specific area of law. Think of it like the difference between a general practitioner and a board-certified specialist in medicine – both are doctors, but one has demonstrated specialized expertise and training.

Why Does Board Certification Matter for Drug Crime Cases?

Florida’s drug crime laws are complex and frequently change. The penalties can be severe, including significant prison sentences, substantial fines, and a permanent criminal record. A Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer has proven:

• Substantial Experience: They have handled a significant number of criminal trials, including cases involving drug offenses.
• Specialized Knowledge: They have successfully passed a rigorous examination covering all aspects of criminal trial law, with a strong emphasis on drug-related offenses.
• Peer Review: They have received positive evaluations from judges and other lawyers familiar with their professional work.
• Continuing Education: They are required to stay current with the latest legal developments and best practices through ongoing legal education.
• Good Standing: They must be a member in good standing of the Florida Bar.

How to Verify if a Lawyer is Board Certified

Not all lawyers who handle drug crime cases are board certified. It’s essential to independently verify this credential. Don’t just take a lawyer’s word for it or rely on outdated information.

Here’s how to confirm a lawyer’s current board certification status:

1. Use the Florida Bar’s “Find a Lawyer” Tool: Go to the official Florida Bar website: https://www.floridabar.org/directories/find-mbr/
2. Enter the Lawyer’s Name: Type in the lawyer’s first and last name.
3. Check the Profile: The lawyer’s profile will clearly indicate if they are currently “Board Certified in Criminal Trial Law.” If it doesn’t say that, they are not currently board certified in that specialty.

You can also find a list of all Board Certified attorneys by specialty area here: https://www.floridabar.org/directories/find-mbr/ Select “Criminal Trial” from the dropdown menu.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Board Certification and Drug Crime Defense

Here are some common questions people have when selecting a lawyer for drug charges:

What percentage of Florida lawyers are Board Certified in Criminal Trial Law?

Less that 1/2 of 1 percent. The Florida Bar maintains high standards for board certification, making it a mark of distinction. While precise numbers fluctuate, it’s significantly less than 1% of attorneys. The certification standards can be found here: https://www.floridabar.org/rules/certification-plans/ And the specific rules are found at Rule 6-3, and 6-4, Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.

Does board certification guarantee a win in my case?

No lawyer can ethically guarantee a specific outcome. However, board certification signifies a higher level of demonstrated expertise and experience, which can significantly improve your chances of a favorable result.

Are Board Certified lawyers more expensive?

Legal fees vary depending on the lawyer’s experience, the complexity of the case, and other factors. A Board Certified specialist may charge more, reflecting their specialized skills. Discuss fees openly during your initial consultation.

What are the minimum requirements to become Board Certified in Criminal Trial Law in Florida?

The requirements are rigorous and include: * At least five years of law practice. * Substantial involvement in criminal trial law (a significant portion of their practice). * Handling a specified number of criminal trials, including jury trials. * Passing a comprehensive written examination. * Favorable peer review from judges and other lawyers. * Completing required continuing legal education. * See the full requirements on the Florida Bar website (discussed above).

Besides board certification, what else should I consider?

Consider experience specifically with your type of drug charge, communication style, case strategy, availability, and your overall comfort level. A consultation is essential for assessing these factors.

Can a lawyer use comparative advertising, mentioning other lawyers by name?

Yes, but with strict limitations. The comparison must be factually accurate, verifiable, and not misleading.

What does it mean if an attorney is advertising using keywords related to other attorneys?

This is a common online advertising technique. It means the attorney is attempting to reach individuals searching for specific legal services or other attorneys. The message must not be misleading or deceptive. The advertising must be truthful and not create unjustified expectations. The Florida Bar has addressed this, confirming that keyword advertising is generally permissible as long as it complies with the general rules on advertising.

Choosing the Right Lawyer for Your Drug Crime Charges in Florida: Understanding Board Certification

A List of Board Certified Experts in Criminal Defense

Florida Attorney’s Name	Is This Attorney Florida Bar Board Certified?
W. F. Casey Ebsary, Jr. Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer
John Castro
Christian Denmon
Nicole Denmon
W. F. Casey Ebsary, Jr. Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer
Richard Escobar
Frank Fernandez
Darren Finebloom
Robin Fuson
Christina Anton Garcia
Michael Celso Gonzalez
David Haenel
William Wooten Hanlon
Stephen Higgins
Marc Alleyne Joseph
Jeff Keel
Michael Maddux Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer
Jason M. Mayberry
Michael Misa
Jeff Paulk
Nicole Denmon
Jason Sammis
Leslie Sammis
Jeff Thomas
Majid Vasigh
Elliott Wilcox
William Wynne

This information is current as of date originally published (2015).

Please check here to see if any of the Drug Crimes Attorneys in this list have since become Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyers.

The FTC and the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. (NAD), govern the laws of comparative advertising in the United States including the treatment of comparative advertising claims. FTC stated that comparative advertising could benefit consumers and encourages comparative advertising, provided that the comparisons are “clearly identified, truthful, and non-deceptive”

The FTC and the National Advertising Division of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, Inc. (NAD), govern the laws of comparative advertising in the United States including the treatment of comparative advertising claims. FTC stated that comparative advertising could benefit consumers and encourages comparative advertising, provided that the comparisons are “clearly identified, truthful, and non-deceptive”

Sources: The Law of Comparative Advertising in the United States J. E. Villafranco, “IP Litigator”, Woltens Kluwer Law & Business, Aspen Publishers, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2010;

Florida Allows Competitive Keyword Advertising By Lawyers;

Suing Ove Keyword Advertising Is A Bad Business Decision For Trademark Owners.

Sources: The Law of Comparative Advertising in the United States  J. E. Villafranco, “IP Litigator”, Woltens Kluwer Law & Business, Aspen Publishers, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2010; 

Florida Allows Competitive Keyword Advertising By Lawyers;

Suing Ove Keyword Advertising Is A Bad Business Decision For Trademark Owners.

Take Action: Contact a Board Certified Drug Crime Lawyer Today

Facing drug charges in Florida is serious, and the lawyer you choose matters. Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyers have proven their expertise in this complex area of law. While no outcome is guaranteed, choosing a specialist like W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr. can give you a significant advantage. He offers a direct, no-nonsense approach, focusing on results.

As emphasized throughout this article, always verify credentials – and you can confirm Mr. Ebsary’s Board Certification through The Florida Bar’s website. Ready for straightforward legal guidance?

Contact Casey directly for a confidential consultation using the secure form on his website: https://drug2go.com/contact-casey-the-lawyer/ – or call his office at (813) 222-2220. Take the first step towards protecting your future.

Drug crimes in Florida carry severe penalties, ranging from misdemeanors to serious felonies. Understanding the nuances of Florida drug laws is crucial if you’re facing charges. This page details 250 Ways to Go to Jail for Drug Crimes in Florida, highlighting common offenses like possession, sale, trafficking, and manufacturing. This broad spectrum underscores the complexity of drug crime laws.

Florida Statute Chapter 893 outlines the Controlled Substances Act, defining prohibited substances and associated penalties. For instance, possession of even a small amount of a controlled substance, as detailed in Possession (linked section on your page), can lead to significant legal consequences. Similarly, charges related to the Sale or Delivery of drugs carry even heavier penalties, often involving mandatory minimum sentences. The severity often depends on the type and quantity of the substance, as well as prior offenses. Even seemingly minor infractions, like possessing Drug Paraphernalia, can result in criminal charges.

An experienced drug crimes attorney can navigate these complexities, protect your rights, and build a strong defense. W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. (813-222-2220) offers legal representation for individuals facing all types of drug crimes charges in Hillsborough County.

Explore the intricate web of Florida’s drug crimes with our Definitive List of Florida Drug Crimes Statutes. In Tampa alone, there are a staggering 250 ways you could find yourself facing charges, spanning misdemeanors to felonies to minimum mandatory sentences.

Drug Crimes Q&A

What is the most common drug crime?

Possession of a controlled substance is the most frequently charged drug offense. This can include illegal narcotics, prescription drugs without a valid prescription, or even certain chemicals used to manufacture drugs. Penalties vary greatly depending on the type and amount of the substance.

What’s the difference between possession and trafficking?

Trafficking involves larger quantities of controlled substances than simple possession. The law presumes that possessing a certain amount indicates an intent to sell or distribute, leading to much harsher penalties. The specific quantity thresholds vary depending on the specific drug.

Are there mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes?

Yes, Florida law mandates minimum sentences for certain drug offenses, particularly trafficking. These mandatory minimums mean a judge has limited discretion in sentencing, even if mitigating circumstances exist. The length of the mandatory minimum depends on the drug type and quantity involved.

Can I be arrested for having prescription drugs?

Yes, you can be arrested if you possess prescription drugs that were not lawfully prescribed to you. It’s also illegal to possess prescription drugs in a container other than the original pharmacy container, or to alter the prescription label. These laws are designed to combat prescription drug abuse and diversion.

What is constructive possession?

Constructive possession means you have control over a substance even if it’s not physically on your person, like in your car or home. The prosecution must prove you knew about the drugs and had the ability to exercise control over them. This is often a key issue in drug cases.

Can drug paraphernalia lead to arrest?

Yes, possession of drug paraphernalia, which includes items used for consuming, producing, or concealing drugs, is a criminal offense. This can range from pipes and bongs to scales and baggies. The prosecution must prove that the items were intended for use with illegal drugs.

What if the drugs were found during an illegal search?

If law enforcement violated your Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures, the evidence may be suppressed. This means the drugs cannot be used against you in court. A successful motion to suppress evidence can often lead to the dismissal of charges.

What’s a plea for withhold of adjudication?

A withhold of adjudication means the court does not formally convict you of the crime, even though you plead guilty or no contest. This can help you avoid some of the collateral consequences of a conviction, such as difficulty finding employment or housing. However, it still counts as a prior offense if you are charged with another crime in the future, particularly in federal drug crimes.

Can you help on Federal Drug cases?

Yes, I have experience handling federal drug cases, which often involve larger quantities and interstate trafficking. Federal drug laws and sentencing guidelines are different from Florida state laws and often carry harsher penalties. Navigating the federal court system requires specialized knowledge and experience.

Do you offer free initial consultation?

Call Casey at 813-222-2220 to discuss your case. The initial consultation allows us to assess the situation, discuss potential defenses, and outline the legal process. This is a no-obligation opportunity to get legal advice.

Our comprehensive list breaks down each offense, detailing the associated Florida Statute and law enforcement’s coded charges. Whether it’s possession, sale, or trafficking of various controlled substances, this guide provides clarity on every charge. Arm yourself with knowledge to navigate the complexities of drug crimes in Hillsborough County, Florida.

The Law Office of W.F. ‘Casey’ Ebsary Jr is here to fight for you or your friend, ensuring a strong defense. Call (813) 222-2220 for legal support.

Definitive List of Florida Drug Crimes Statutes

There are 250 Ways to Go to Jail for Drug Crimes in Tampa. There are 250 types of Drug Crimes Charged in Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida. Here is a list of every type of drug crime charged in Hillsborough County. The list includes the Florida Statute number and the computer codes used by law enforcement to classify the charged offenses. These are frequently referred to as charges codes or form codes.

The list includes both felonies and misdemeanors, includes the Florida Statute, and a brief description of the charges.

250 Ways to Go to Jail for Drug Crimes in Tampa, Florida

Form Code Statute Level Degree Charge Description

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Drug2Go.com

2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606Phone: 813-222-2220
Email: centrallaw@gmail.com

• Which Judge will preside over my Tampa / Hillsborough County Drug Crimes Case?
• DRUG1300 POSSESSION OF COCAINE WITH INTENT TO SELL OR D
• DRUG1904 TRAFFICKING IN COCAINE 28 TO 200 GRAMS
• Trafficking in Cocaine | Florida Conviction Overturned
• DRUG2300 POSSESSION OF CANNABIS WITH INTENT TO SELL OR

Introduction

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Prescription Drug Charges – Are you or someone you know facing drug trafficking charges in Hillsborough County, Florida? The recent dismissal of drug trafficking charges against Prescription Drug Defense Trafficking Florida offers hope in a critical aspect of defense—valid prescription defense. This comprehensive guide explores the Withholding Information From Medical Practitioner Case, shedding light on the intricacies of Florida Statute 893.13.7A8, a felony charge for obtaining drugs from a physician by withholding information. Additionally, we delve into the broader implications of the court’s ruling and its impact on drug trafficking charges. Read on to understand the significance of this case and how it can shape legal strategies in defending against drug-related accusations.

Statute Excerpt

Florida Statute: 893.13.7A8
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 3rd
Description: Obtaining Drugs From Physician By Withholding

DRUG9892 is often charged in Hillsborough County, Florida.

893.13 Prohibited acts; penalties.

8. To withhold information from a practitioner from whom the person seeks to obtain a controlled substance or a prescription for a controlled substance that the person making the request has received a controlled substance or a prescription for a controlled substance of like therapeutic use from another practitioner within the previous 30 days.

Drug Trafficking Prescription Drug Charges

Drug trafficking charges are among the most serious offenses one can face in the realm of drug-related crimes. In Florida, these charges carry severe penalties, often including lengthy prison sentences and hefty fines. The Withholding Information From Medical Practitioner Case serves as an illustrative example of how legal intricacies, especially related to valid prescription defenses, can play a pivotal role in the dismissal of such charges.

In general terms, drug trafficking involves the illegal sale, transportation, import, or distribution of controlled substances. The severity of the charges typically depends on factors such as the type and quantity of the drugs involved. Florida law categorizes drug trafficking as a felony offense, with varying degrees of severity, each associated with different penalties.

“Whether an individual has actually withheld information in violation of the statute depends on whether s/he requested a controlled substance and failed to disclose the fact that s/he received a drug of like therapeutic use within the previous thirty days. In other words, the statute requires that an individual affirmatively requesting a substance provide information to the practitioner.”

Florida State Drug Trafficking Charges:

In the state of Florida, drug trafficking is a serious offense governed by stringent laws. The severity of the charges often depends on various factors, including the type and quantity of controlled substances involved. Florida Statute 893.135 outlines the state’s approach to drug trafficking, categorizing offenses based on the type of substance and the quantity in possession.

Florida classifies drug trafficking as a felony, with potential penalties ranging from substantial fines to mandatory minimum prison sentences. The exact consequences depend on the specific substance and the amount trafficked. For instance, trafficking in opioids such as heroin or fentanyl may lead to more severe penalties compared to other controlled substances.

One key element of drug trafficking charges in Florida is the presence of mandatory minimum sentences. Judges are bound by these minimums, meaning that if an individual is convicted of drug trafficking, the court must impose a sentence that meets or exceeds these statutory minimums. This rigidity underscores the seriousness with which Florida addresses drug trafficking offenses.

Federal Middle District of Florida Drug Prescription Drug Trafficking Charges:

When drug trafficking charges escalate to the federal level, the legal landscape becomes even more complex. The Federal Middle District of Florida, encompassing cities like Tampa and Orlando, falls under the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Federal drug trafficking charges typically involve violations of the Controlled Substances Act. The federal government has substantial resources and authority to prosecute these cases, often leading to more severe penalties than those imposed at the state level.

The Federal Middle District of Florida handles a wide array of drug trafficking cases, ranging from cocaine and heroin to prescription medications and synthetic drugs. Federal prosecutors have broad discretion in pursuing charges based on factors such as the quantity of drugs involved, the presence of firearms, and whether the alleged trafficking occurred near schools or other protected areas.

Federal sentences for drug trafficking convictions can be harsh, with the potential for lengthy prison terms and substantial fines. Cooperation with federal agencies, such as the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), may also play a role in the outcome of these cases.

Defense Strategies for Drug Trafficking Charges:

Facing drug trafficking charges in either the state or federal jurisdiction necessitates a robust defense strategy. Consulting with an experienced criminal defense attorney, like Casey the Lawyer, is crucial. Defense strategies may include challenging the legality of searches and seizures, questioning the admissibility of evidence, and exploring potential violations of constitutional rights.

Additionally, for federal cases, negotiation and cooperation with federal prosecutors may lead to reduced charges or more favorable plea deals. The expertise of a seasoned attorney becomes invaluable in navigating the complexities of both state and federal legal systems.

In conclusion, drug trafficking charges in Florida, whether at the state or federal level, demand a comprehensive understanding of the law and a strategic defense approach. Seeking immediate legal counsel is essential for individuals facing these serious allegations. Casey the Lawyer, with a focus on drug defense, provides the expertise needed to navigate the intricate legal terrain and build a robust defense tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. If you or someone you know is confronting drug trafficking charges, don’t hesitate to contact Casey the Lawyer at 813-222-2220 for a consultation.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Implications of Court’s Ruling on Drug Trafficking Charges

The Withholding Information From Medical Practitioner Case not only addressed the specifics of the statute but also had profound implications for drug trafficking charges. By emphasizing the necessity for individuals to affirmatively request a controlled substance and provide information to the practitioner about prior prescriptions, the court’s ruling highlighted the importance of a valid prescription defense.

In cases where individuals possess valid prescriptions issued by licensed practitioners, such as in the instance of Jeremy Knipp, the court’s decision strengthens the grounds for invoking a valid prescription defense against drug trafficking charges. This legal precedent reinforces the notion that individuals with legitimate medical needs should not face severe consequences if they have adhered to proper medical protocols and possess valid prescriptions for controlled substances.

Valid Prescription Defense

Valid prescriptions are typically issued by licensed medical practitioners, such as physicians or other authorized healthcare professionals. These documents outline the type, dosage, and duration of the prescribed medication.

The possession of a valid prescription is particularly relevant in scenarios where individuals are accused of unlawfully possessing or obtaining controlled substances. It establishes a lawful basis for the individual’s access to certain medications and provides a legitimate reason for their presence.

Prescription Defense in Drug Possession Cases:

In drug possession cases, having a valid prescription can serve as a potent defense strategy. When individuals can demonstrate that they are in lawful possession of a controlled substance due to a valid prescription, it challenges the prosecution’s assertion of illegal possession. This defense strategy is especially effective when the prosecution cannot contest the authenticity of the prescription or when the prescription is for the same substance allegedly possessed.

For example, if an individual is charged with unlawfully possessing a prescription painkiller, presenting a valid prescription for that specific medication can be a compelling defense. It shifts the burden to the prosecution to prove that the possession was, indeed, unlawful.

Valid Prescription Defense in Drug Trafficking Cases:

In more serious cases, such as drug trafficking charges, the possession of valid prescriptions can be equally impactful. While drug trafficking often involves the illegal distribution or transportation of controlled substances, the existence of valid prescriptions can challenge the prosecution’s argument that the accused individuals were engaged in illicit activities.

In jurisdictions where statutes require individuals to disclose previous prescriptions when seeking similar medications, possessing valid prescriptions becomes not only a defense but a proactive legal practice. It aligns with legal obligations to inform healthcare providers about existing prescriptions and can be crucial in defending against charges related to withholding information from medical practitioners.

Collaborating with Legal Counsel:

Navigating the complexities of drug-related charges and presenting a robust prescription defense requires the expertise of a seasoned attorney. Legal professionals, such as Casey the Lawyer, understand the intricacies of drug laws and can strategically leverage valid prescriptions to build a compelling defense.

Whether at the state or federal level, consulting with an attorney early in the legal process is essential. Legal professionals can assess the specifics of the case, scrutinize the validity of prescriptions, and craft a defense strategy tailored to the unique circumstances of each client.

In conclusion, possessing valid prescriptions is a powerful legal tool that can significantly impact the outcome of drug-related cases. It not only serves as a defense against allegations of unlawful possession but also plays a vital role in challenging more severe charges like drug trafficking. If you or someone you know is facing drug-related charges, contact Casey the Lawyer at 813-222-2220 for expert legal guidance and a thorough evaluation of your case.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Navigating Drug Trafficking Charges

Navigating drug trafficking charges demands strategic legal expertise, especially in jurisdictions with stringent drug laws like Florida. Casey the Lawyer, based at Drug2go.com, brings a wealth of experience in handling complex drug-related cases, including those involving drug trafficking allegations. Understanding the nuances of statutes such as Florida Statute 893.13.7A8 and the implications of recent court rulings is essential for building a robust defense strategy.

Casey the Lawyer’s approach involves a meticulous examination of the details surrounding the charges. This includes assessing the type and quantity of the alleged controlled substances, the circumstances of the arrest, and, crucially, whether the accused individuals possess valid prescriptions for the substances in question. Leveraging legal precedents, including the Withholding Information From Medical Practitioner Case, Casey aims to secure favorable outcomes for clients facing drug trafficking charges.

Florida Drug Trafficking Minimum Mandatory Sentences

When it comes to drug trafficking charges in Florida, the state imposes minimum mandatory sentences that judges must adhere to when determining the penalties for convicted individuals. These mandatory minimums are often stringent, reflecting the severity with which the state treats drug trafficking offenses. The minimum mandatory sentences vary based on factors such as the type and quantity of the controlled substances involved in the trafficking.

For example, in Florida, trafficking in opioids like heroin may result in minimum mandatory sentences ranging from three years to life imprisonment, depending on the quantity. The minimum mandatory sentences escalate significantly for larger quantities, and individuals convicted of drug trafficking may also face substantial fines.

Dismissal of Drug Trafficking Charges

The dismissal of drug trafficking charges is a rare but impactful outcome that underscores the importance of a robust defense strategy. In cases like the Withholding Information From Medical Practitioner Case, the court’s careful examination of the statute and the defendant’s circumstances led to the dismissal of charges. This outcome is often achieved when the defense successfully presents evidence supporting a valid prescription defense or highlights procedural errors in the prosecution’s case.

To secure a dismissal of drug trafficking charges, it’s crucial to collaborate with an experienced attorney who can navigate the complexities of drug-related cases. Casey the Lawyer, with a proven track record in drug defense, understands the nuances of Florida drug laws and leverages legal precedents to build a compelling defense. Whether challenging the admissibility of evidence, questioning the legality of the arrest, or presenting a solid prescription defense, strategic legal maneuvers are essential to achieving favorable outcomes.

Prescription Drug Charges Conclusion

The dismissal of drug trafficking charges in the Withholding Information From Medical Practitioner Case underscores the paramount importance of a valid prescription defense. If you or someone you know is grappling with drug-related charges, especially drug trafficking allegations, it’s crucial to seek legal counsel promptly. Contact Casey, the experienced Hillsborough Drug Attorney, at 813-222-2220 for a consultation. Don’t let drug charges jeopardize your future—take action today to secure a robust defense.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Prescription Drug Defense Trafficking Floridapdf

Download

Case Highlight: ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S TRAFFIC STOP MOTION TO SUPPRESS

Meet LP, who found himself in a legal battle after being stopped for a traffic infraction. The passenger in a car subjected to a seatbelt violation stop, LP faced charges related to firearm and crack cocaine possession. The Lawyer took on the case, challenging the constitutionality of the search.\\

The legal battle in a Traffic Stop centered on the Fourth Amendment, with the defense arguing that LP’s removal from the car and subsequent search were unconstitutional.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Unveiling the Unlawful Search

The legal battle centered on the Fourth Amendment, a traffic stop, and the defense arguing that LP’s removal from the car and subsequent search were unconstitutional. The lead officer, Detective Hernandez, claimed the search was for “officer safety.” However, the court disagreed, pointing out incongruities between testimonial and demonstrative evidence.

The protection of individual rights stands as a fundamental pillar. This case of serves as a poignant example of the delicate balance between law enforcement’s duty and citizens’ constitutional rights. LP, a passenger in a routine traffic stop, found himself at the center of a controversy that echoes through the corridors of the Fourth Amendment.

The Traffic Stop Turned Unconstitutional Search

The saga begins with Detective Angel Hernandez, a member of the Tactical Robbery Unit in the City of Miami Police Department. LP was in a Maserati, and Hernandez, intrigued by the absence of a seatbelt, initiated a traffic stop. The subsequent events, however, raise questions about the legality of LP’s search.

During a hearing on LP’s motion to suppress evidence, Hernandez admitted that the sole reason for the traffic stop was the absence of a seatbelt. No other traffic violations or suspicions of criminal activity preceded the stop. Det. Hernandez’s focus, both during and after the stop, was primarily on the driver, leaving LP in the hands of Detective Labrador (DL).

Unraveling Contradictions: Testimonies vs. Video Evidence

As the legal proceedings unfolded, contradictions emerged between the testimonies and the video evidence. The second Detective DL, concerned for his safety, testified that LP’s removal from the car and subsequent pat-down were justified. However, the body-worn camera footage painted a starkly different picture.

The video revealed a disproportionate use of force. DL, a strapping figure, handled LP with an unnecessary level of aggression. LP, who posed no threat, was subjected to an intrusive search that went beyond the bounds of a standard pat-down. The court, recognizing the disparities between testimonial and demonstrative evidence, cast doubt on the legitimacy of DL’s claims.

Legal Analysis: Violation of Fourth Amendment Rights

The court’s findings declared LP’s search unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. The Terry frisk, a lawful pat-down, necessitates reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous. In LP’s case, the court questioned the legitimacy of the “officer safety” concern, ultimately determining the lack of justification for the search.

Inevitable Discovery Doctrine: A Failed Defense

In a last-ditch effort to rescue the admissibility of the obtained evidence, the prosecution turned to the Inevitable Discovery Doctrine. This legal doctrine, when successfully argued, permits evidence acquired through unlawful means to be considered admissible if it can be demonstrated that the same evidence would have inevitably been discovered through lawful means.

Despite the prosecution’s efforts, the court remained unpersuaded. The prosecution encountered significant hurdles in proving that law enforcement had a well-defined and articulable plan to search the car independently of the initial unconstitutional search. The court emphasized that the lack of probable cause further weakened the prosecution’s position, highlighting a critical point – the drugs and firearm would not have come to light had the initial, constitutionally questionable search not taken place.

The Inadequacy of the Prosecution’s Argument

The prosecution bore the burden of establishing that the discovery of the evidence was truly “inevitable.” However, the court found that the prosecution fell short of meeting this heavy burden. The absence of a specific and articulable plan for searching the car, apart from the unconstitutional search, became a glaring weakness in the prosecution’s argument.

The court scrutinized the testimony of Detective Hernandez, the lead officer in the case. Det. Hernandez’s admission that the car would not have been subjected to a search if the drugs and firearm were not found on the passenger, LP, underscored the lack of a predetermined plan. This admission became a pivotal factor, as it indicated that the subsequent search of the car was a direct consequence of the unconstitutional search, rather than an independent and inevitable course of action.

The Probable Cause Conundrum

A significant blow to the prosecution’s case came from the acknowledgment that there was no probable cause to search the car or detain LP beyond the initial unconstitutional search. The court highlighted that Det. Hernandez explicitly stated that the only grounds for LP’s arrest were the drugs and firearm found on his person. This admission underscored a critical flaw in the prosecution’s argument – without the evidence obtained through the unconstitutional search, there was no legal basis for the subsequent actions taken by law enforcement.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Explaining The Inevitable Discovery Doctrine in a Traffic Stop

The court’s decision to reject the inevitable discovery doctrine was grounded in the failure of the prosecution to demonstrate that, even in the absence of the unconstitutional search, the evidence would have surfaced through lawful means. The doctrine hinges on the concept that law enforcement must have a specific and independent plan to discover the evidence. In this case, the lack of such a plan, coupled with the absence of probable cause, led the court to dismiss the prosecution’s argument.

The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine

The court also delved into the legal principle known as the “fruit of the poisonous tree.” This doctrine holds that evidence obtained as a result of an unconstitutional search is tainted and, therefore, inadmissible in court. The court drew parallels to this doctrine, emphasizing that if the initial search was deemed unconstitutional, the subsequent discovery of drugs and the firearm would be considered as the “fruit” of that unconstitutional search.

Incorporating the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine further fortified the court’s decision to suppress the evidence. The court underscored the interconnected nature of the evidence, highlighting that the unconstitutional search set in motion a chain of events leading to the discovery of the drugs and firearm.

A Victory for Constitutional Rights

In conclusion, the court’s meticulous analysis and rejection of the inevitable discovery doctrine dealt a severe blow to the prosecution’s case. The inability to establish a concrete and independent plan for discovering the evidence, coupled with the absence of probable cause, led the court to suppress the evidence. The application of the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine further solidified the court’s decision, emphasizing the importance of upholding constitutional rights even in the pursuit of justice. This ruling stands as a testament to the court’s commitment to maintaining the integrity of the legal process and safeguarding individual rights against unlawful searches and seizures.

Implications for Future Cases

LP’s case reverberates beyond its immediate legal context. The court’s decision to suppress evidence sets a precedent, reinforcing the importance of upholding Fourth Amendment rights. The impact of this case extends to future encounters between law enforcement and individuals, serving as a reminder of the boundaries that protect citizens from unlawful searches and seizures.

Know Your Rights: Traffic Stop Guide for Individuals

The broader implications of LP’s case necessitate a deeper understanding of Fourth Amendment rights among the general public. Knowing one’s rights is a powerful tool in the face of potential legal overreach.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Understanding Fourth Amendment Rights

The Fourth Amendment guarantees protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Understanding what constitutes a legal search and seizure is crucial. Law enforcement must have reasonable suspicion or probable cause to initiate a search.

Legal Consequences of Unlawful Searches

The consequences of unconstitutional searches are severe. The exclusionary rule, established by the courts, prohibits the use of evidence obtained illegally. This extends to the concept of the “fruit of the poisonous tree,” emphasizing that evidence derived from an unconstitutional search is tainted and inadmissible.

Casey, the Lawyer: Defender of Rights

Let us help you 813.222.2220

In the pursuit of justice, legal representation plays a pivotal role. The defense attorney emerged as a key figure in LP’s fight against unconstitutional searches. This successful motion to suppress evidence stands as a victory not only for him but for the broader fight against unjust searches. The court’s decision reinforces the role of legal professionals in safeguarding individual rights.

How Casey Can Help You

Individuals facing similar situations can benefit from Casey’s legal services. Consultations and representation are offered to those seeking defense against unlawful searches and seizures. As citizens, understanding our rights and holding law enforcement accountable is crucial. A victory in suppressing evidence echoes through the corridors of justice, reaffirming the importance of the Fourth Amendment in preserving the fabric of a just and fair society.

Defend Your Rights in a Traffic Stop

If you find yourself in a traffic stop situation involving an unlawful search, seek legal assistance immediately. Casey, the Lawyer, stands ready to defend your rights and ensure that justice prevails.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Let us help you 813.222.2220

The Odor of Cannabis in Florida: A Legal Perspective

Florida court upholds probable cause based on the odor of marijuana for vehicle searches despite hemp and marijuana legalization. Legal insights for defendants.

We concede, without affirmatively holding, that such a circumstance (such as where the individual has a lawful prescription or that the substance is hemp) might provide an affirmative defense to a charge of a criminal offense, but it would not prevent the search.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Introduction

In recent years, the odor of cannabis has become more common and the debate surrounding the legality and implications of marijuana and hemp in Florida has taken center stage. With the legalization of hemp and, under certain circumstances, marijuana, it has sparked discussions about the role of the odor of marijuana in law enforcement. The Second District Court of Appeal in Florida recently tackled this issue in the case of the Defendant and his defense attorney, challenging a guilty plea for possession of methamphetamine. This article delves into the court’s decision and the implications it has on the odor of cannabis in Florida.

Background

The Defendant argued that the search of the vehicle was solely based on the odor of marijuana, contending that due to the legalization of marijuana and hemp in Florida, the odor of marijuana could no longer serve as probable cause for a vehicle search. The Defendant raised a compelling argument, pointing to the difficulty of distinguishing the scent of marijuana from that of hemp, which is legal. The Court’s decision and reasoning provide insight into the legal landscape surrounding this issue.

Court’s Decision

The Court, in its decision, rejected the Defendant’s argument and upheld their judgment and sentence. They disagreed with the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court’s decision in State v. Nord, which held that the odor of marijuana alone couldn’t establish probable cause for a search during a traffic stop. Instead, they adopted the Ninth Judicial Circuit’s opinion in State v. Ruise, which concluded that an officer smelling the odor of marijuana during a traffic stop could justify a warrantless search of the vehicle, even if the odor was indistinguishable from that of legal hemp.

The Court emphasized that the odor of marijuana provided an officer with probable cause to believe that it indicated the illegal use of marijuana. They argued that the circumstances of the case, involving reckless driving and erratic behavior, further supported the officer’s decision to detain the Defendant and search the vehicle.

Future Implications

The Court’s decision signifies that, even if marijuana is legalized for recreational use, using it while driving could still lead to charges of driving while intoxicated. The smell of burning marijuana remains valid probable cause for a vehicle search, which aligns with a “practical and common sensical standard” of probable cause.

While recognizing that there might be legitimate explanations for the presence of the odor of fresh marijuana in a vehicle, such as a lawful prescription or the use of hemp, the Court asserted that such explanations would serve as an affirmative defense rather than a deterrent for a search.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the recent decision by the Second District Court of Appeal in Florida reaffirms that the odor of marijuana continues to be a valid basis for probable cause to search a vehicle, regardless of the legalization of hemp and certain circumstances surrounding marijuana. This decision provides clarity on an issue that has been at the forefront of legal discussions in Florida and maintains the balance between personal freedom and public safety.

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Complete Odor of Cannabis Opinion of the Florida Court

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

EVANS JOSHUA OWENS, ) ) Appellant, ) )

v. ) Case No. 2D20-537 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) )

Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed March 31, 2021.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. Fernandez, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

VILLANTI, Judge.

Evans Joshua Owens challenges his judgment and sentence following his guilty plea to the offense of possession of methamphetamine. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his preserved, dispositive motion to suppress. Owens argues, in

pertinent part, that the search of his vehicle was based solely on the odor of marijuana and that because possession of marijuana in some instances, and hemp in all instances, has been legalized in Florida, the odor of marijuana can no longer serve as the basis for probable cause to search a vehicle because the odor of marijuana cannot be distinguished from that of hemp. We reject this argument and affirm Owens’ judgment and sentence.

We are aware of the decision of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida that held that the smell of marijuana in connection with a traffic stop cannot constitute the sole basis supporting probable cause for a search. See State v. Nord, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 511 (Fla. 20th Cir. Ct. Aug. 8, 2020). With all due respect to the capable and experienced circuit judge who authored that opinion, we cannot agree. Instead, we hold that an officer smelling the odor of marijuana has probable cause to believe that the odor indicates the illegal use of marijuana. Accordingly, to the extent that it conflicts with this decision, we disapprove of Nord and adopt the opinion of the Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida in State v. Ruise, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 122 (Fla. 9th Cir. Ct. Mar. 20, 2020) (holding that an officer who smelled the odor of marijuana during a traffic stop had probable cause for a warrantless search of the vehicle, even though the odor of cannabis was found to be indistinguishable from the odor of now legal hemp).

We also note that, in this case, the officer was responding to a complaint of reckless and erratic driving; and Owens’ odd and erratic responses to the officer’s attempts to communicate with him, coupled with the smell, caused the officer to reasonably conclude that Owens should not be “behind the wheel of a vehicle.” Thus, the circumstances supported the officer’s conclusion that he had probable cause to

– 2

detain Owens and to search his vehicle.1 Finally, we note that even if marijuana was legalized for recreational use, such use while driving would still support the offense of driving while intoxicated; thus, regardless of whether marijuana becomes decriminalized for recreational use, the smell of the burning substance will continue to provide probable cause for a search of a vehicle. See Johnson v. State, 275 So. 3d 800, 802 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (“[E]ven if smoking marijuana were legal altogether, the officers would have probable cause based on the fact that Johnson was operating a car.” (citing § 316.193(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2018))).2 “The probable cause standard, after all, is a ‘practical and common sensical standard.’ It is enough if there is the ‘the kind of fair probability’ on which ‘reasonable and prudent people, not legal technicians, act.’ ” Id. (quoting Florida v. Harris, 568 U.S. 237, 244 (2013)).

We recognize that there may be a circumstance where an occupant of a vehicle may have a legitimate explanation for the presence of the smell of fresh (not burning or burnt) marijuana in the vehicle, such as where the individual has a lawful prescription for it, or that the substance is, in fact, hemp. But even the current version of section 381.986, which permits qualified physicians to prescribe the smoking of marijuana as “an appropriate route of administration for a qualified patient,” see § 381.986(4)(c),3 continues to prohibit the use of smoked marijuana in vehicles, see 1 As Owens exited the vehicle, the officer saw a plastic bag in plain sight containing a crystal-like substance that was later proven to be methamphetamine. 2

We are confident that in the event marijuana becomes legal for recreational use in Florida, the legislature will amend the statutes pertaining to driving while intoxicated accordingly.

3As amended by ch. 2019-1, Laws of Florida.

– 3

§ 381.986(1)(j)5 (providing that “medical use” of marijuana does not include use of marijuana on any form of public transportation; in any public place; or on a school bus, vehicle, aircraft, or motorboat “except for low-THC cannabis not in a form for smoking” (emphasis added)). Cf. Johnson, 275 So. 3d at 802 (holding that even if the driver was a medical marijuana user, this would not defeat probable cause).

We concede, without affirmatively holding, that such a circumstance (such as where the individual has a lawful prescription or that the substance is hemp) might provide an affirmative defense to a charge of a criminal offense, but it would not prevent the search. Nevertheless, we can think of no circumstance where an affirmative defense might lie where the impetus for the search arose from the smell of burnt marijuana in a vehicle.

Accordingly, we conclude that the recent legalization of hemp, and under certain circumstances marijuana, does not serve as a sea change undoing existing precedent, and we hold that regardless of whether the smell of marijuana is indistinguishable from that of hemp, the smell of marijuana emanating from a vehicle continues to provide probable cause for a warrantless search of the vehicle. See, e.g., State v. Brookins, 290 So. 3d 1100, 1104 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (“Our supreme court has observed that the odor of burnt marijuana emanating from a vehicle—like we have here—provides probable cause to search each of the vehicle’s occupants.” (citing State v. Betz, 815 So. 2d 627, 633 (Fla. 2002))); accord Johnson, 275 So. 3d at 802.

Affirmed.

SLEET and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

– 4

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Within the framework of the Florida Statutes and Drug Laws, a meticulous approach is taken to categorize and govern controlled substances through the utilization of precise chemical nomenclature. This method enables regulatory bodies to not only clearly define the substances under consideration but also to establish rigorous guidelines for their utilization.

The Florida Drug Name Dictionary Online emerges as an indispensable tool in this regulatory landscape, functioning as a robust and comprehensive resource.This online dictionary serves a pivotal role by elucidating the intricate details of chemical compositions and providing nuanced classifications for an array of substances falling within the purview of the law. Through this resource, legal practitioners, law enforcement officials, healthcare professionals, and the general public gain access to a wealth of information crucial for understanding the nature and implications of various substances.

By shedding light on the chemical intricacies of controlled substances, the Florida Drug Name Dictionary Online enhances transparency and clarity in the legal landscape. It empowers those involved in the enforcement and interpretation of drug laws to make informed decisions based on accurate and up-to-date information. Moreover, it serves as a proactive measure in promoting public awareness, contributing to a more informed and educated society regarding the substances subject to legal scrutiny.

In essence, the marriage of precise chemical nomenclature within the statutory framework and the accessibility provided by the Florida Drug Name Dictionary Online creates a harmonious synergy, fostering a more effective, informed, and accountable approach to the regulation of controlled substances in the state.

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Let us help you 813.222.2220

What are the chemical names used in the Florida Statutes and Drug Laws?

The Florida Statutes and Drug Laws employ chemical names to precisely identify controlled substances and regulate their use. The Florida Drug Name Dictionary Online serves as a comprehensive resource, shedding light on the chemical compositions and classifications of various substances.

Here are some examples:

Benzodiazepine: This family of sedative-hypnotic drugs, including Xanax and Valium, addresses stress, anxiety, seizures, and alcohol withdrawal.

Buprenorphine: A semi-synthetic opioid used for treating opioid addiction and moderate to severe pain.

Cannabinoids: Compounds found in marijuana, with THC being the most psychoactive. Common street names include “ganja” and “reefer.”

Carisoprodol: A muscle relaxant marketed as Soma, often abused for its euphoric effects.

Cocaine: An illicit stimulant with street names like “blow” and “crack.”

Fentanyl: A synthetic narcotic analgesic used in patches or lollipops, addressing severe pain.

Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB): A depressant known as a “date rape” drug, with street names like “liquid X” and “easy lay.”

Heroin: An illicit narcotic derivative with street names like “smack” and “H.”

Hydrocodone: A narcotic analgesic found in drugs like Vicodin, addressing pain.

Ketamine: An animal tranquilizer and hallucinogen with street names like “special K.”

Methadone: A synthetic narcotic used in detoxification and pain management.

Methylated Amphetamines: Including methamphetamine and MDMA (Ecstasy), with various street names.

Morphine: A narcotic analgesic used for moderate to severe pain.

Oxycodone: Found in drugs like OxyContin, Percocet, and Roxicodone, addressing pain.

Phencyclidine (PCP): An illicit dissociative anesthetic/hallucinogen with street names like “angel dust.”

Propoxyphene: A synthetic narcotic used for mild to moderate pain.

Rohypnol: Known as a “date rape” drug, a sedative-hypnotic in the Benzodiazepine class.

Tramadol: A synthetic narcotic analgesic used for moderate to severe pain.

Zolpidem: A prescription medication for short-term insomnia treatment, commonly known as Ambien.

The Florida Statutes classify these substances into different schedules based on their potential for abuse and accepted medical use, with varying degrees of restrictions and controls.

The Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr stands ready to navigate the legal complexities surrounding these substances, advocating for individuals and their rights.

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Florida Drug Name Dictionary Online

Benzodiazepine – A family of sedative-hypnotic drugs indicated for the treatment of stress, anxiety, seizures and alcohol withdrawal. Benzodiazepines are often referred to as “minor tranquilizers.” Xanax (Alprazolam) and Valium (Diazepam) are the most commonly prescribed drugs in this drug class.

Buprenorphine – A semi-synthetic opioid known as Buprenex, Suboxone, and Subutex indicated for the treatment of opioid addiction and moderate to severe pain.

Cannabinoids – A series of compounds found in the marijuana plant, the most psychoactive of which is THC, a strong, illicit hallucinogen. Street names for this drug are often associated with a geographic area from which it came but also include generic names like “ganja”, “MY, “ragweed”, “reefer” and “grass.”

Carisoprodol – Muscle relaxant indicated for the treatment of pain, muscle spasms and limited mobility. It is often abused in conjunction with analgesics for enhanced euphoric effect. It is marketed as Soma.

Cocaine – An illicit stimulant. Powdered cocaine goes by many street names including “C”, “blow”, “snow” and “nose candy”, while freebase cocaine is mostly commonly known as “crack.”

Difluoroethane -A gas that is commonly found in electronic cleaning products, and many other consumer aerosol products.

Ethyl Alcohol – Alcohol or ethanol.

Fentanyl – Synthetic narcotic analgesic (pain killer) used in the Durgesic transdermal patch. Also available in a solid “lollypop” sold under the brand name Actiq.

Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) – A depressant, also known as a “date rape” drug. GHB often goes by the street name “easy lay”, “scoop”, “liquid X”, “Georgia home boy” and “grievous bodily harm.”

Heroin – An illicit narcotic derivative. It is a semi-synthetic product of opium. Heroin also has multiple street names including “H”, “hombre” and “smack.”

Hydrocodone -A narcotic analgesic (pain killer). Vicodin and Lortab are two common drugs containing hydrocodone.

Hydromorphone – A narcotic analgesic (pain killer) used to treat moderate to severe pain. Marketed under the trade name Dilaudid, it is two to eight times more potent than morphine. Commonly used by abusers as a substitute for heroin.

Ketamine -An animal tranquilizer and a chemical relative of PCP. Street names for this drug include “special K”, ”vitamin K” and “cat valium.”

Meperidine – A synthetic narcotic analgesic (pain killer) sold under the trade name Demerol, it is used for pre-anesthesia and the relief of moderate to severe pain.

Methadone – A synthetic narcotic analgesic (pain killer) commonly associated with Heroin detoxification and maintenance programs but it is also prescribed to treat severe pain. It has been increasingly prescribed in place of oxycodone for pain management. Dolophine is one form of methadone.

Methylated Amphetamines – Includes such drugs as methamphetamine (stimulant) and MDMA (Ecstasy – which is a hallucinogen). Ecstasy has multiple street names including “E”, “XTC”, “love drug”, and “clarity”. MDMA is often also known by a large variety of embossed logos on the pills such as “Mitsubishis” and “Killer Bees”. Methamphetamine is also known as “meth”, “crank”, “speed” and “tina”.

Morphine – A narcotic analgesic (pain killer) used to treat moderate to severe pain. MS (Morphine Sulfate), Kadian, and MS-Contin are the tablet forms, Roxanol is the liquid form.

Nitrous Oxide (N20) – Also known as “laughing gas,” this is an inhalant (gas) that produces light anesthesia and analgesia. “Whippets” are a common form of nitrous oxide.

Oxycodone – A narcotic analgesic (pain killer). OxyContin is one form of this drug and goes by the street name “OC”. Percocet, Percodan, Roxicet, Tylox, and Roxicodone also contain Oxycodone.

Oxymorphone – A narcotic analgesic (pain killer). Prescribed as Opana, Numorphan, and Numorphone.

Phencyclidine (PCP) – An illicit dissociative anesthetic/hallucinogen. Common street names for this drug include “angel dust”, “ace”, “DOA” and “wack”.

Propoxyphene – A synthetic narcotic analgesic (pain killer) used for mild to moderate pain. A chemical cousin to methadone, it is marketed under the trade name Darvon and Darvocet when mixed with acetaminophen.

Rohypnol – Commonly referred to as a “date rape” drug. It is a sedative-hypnotic drug in the Benzodiazepine class. It often goes by the street name “roofies”.

Tramadol – A synthetic narcotic analgesic sold under the trade name Ultram and Ultracet. Indications include the treatment of moderate to severe pain. It is a chemical analogue to Codeine. Not currently a scheduled drug.

Zolpidem -A prescription medication used for the short-term treatment of insomnia. Commonly known as Ambien.

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Let us help you 813.222.2220

Where is the Complete List of Schedule I Drugs under Florida Law?

“A substance in Schedule I has a high potential for abuse and has no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States and in its use under medical supervision does not meet accepted safety standards.” The Complete List of Schedule I Drugs under Florida Law can be found here.

Where is the Complete List of Schedule II Drugs under Florida Law?

“A substance in Schedule II has a high potential for abuse and has a currently accepted but severely restricted medical use in treatment in the United States, and abuse of the substance may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence.” The Complete List of Schedule II Substances in Florida is here.

Where is the Complete List of Schedule III Drugs under Florida Law?

“A substance in Schedule III has a potential for abuse less than the substances contained in Schedules I and II and has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and abuse of the substance may lead to moderate or low physical dependence or high psychological dependence or, in the case of anabolic steroids, may lead to physical damage. Here is the Complete List of Substances controlled in Schedule III.

Where is the Complete List of Schedule IV Drugs under Florida Law?

“A substance in Schedule IV has a low potential for abuse relative to the substances in Schedule III and has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, and abuse of the substance may lead to limited physical or psychological dependence relative to the substances in Schedule III. Unless specifically excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which contains any quantity of the following substances, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical designation, are controlled in Schedule IV. The Complete List of Schedule IV Drugs under Florida Law can be found here.

Drug Dictionary, Benzodiazepine, Fentanyl, Gamma-Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB), Methadone, Heroin, Rohypnol, Methamphetamine, Cocaine, Hydromorphone, Methamphetamine, Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, Marijuana

Sources:

2010 Medical Examiners Commission Interim Drug Report Page 33, 34

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0800-0899/0893/Sections/0893.03.html

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Let us help you 813.222.2220