<![CDATA[Possession of Cannabis - Law Offices of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr.]]> https://www.drug2go.com/blog/tags/possession-of-cannabis/ Wed, 29 Apr 2026 20:33:48 GMT en-us <![CDATA[Drug2102 Possession of Cannabis]]> https://www.drug2go.com/blog/drug2102-possession-of-cannabis/ https://www.drug2go.com/blog/drug2102-possession-of-cannabis/ Wed, 26 Mar 2025 02:06:33 GMT DRUG2102: Navigating Cannabis Possession Charges in Hillsborough County, FL (2025) The term “DRUG2102” is a critical identifier for individuals facing cannabis possession charges within the Florida legal system, specifically in Hillsborough County. As the legal landscape around cannabis evolves in 2025, understanding the implications of a DRUG2102 charge is paramount. This designation, tied to Florida…

]]>

DRUG2102: Navigating Cannabis Possession Charges in Hillsborough County, FL (2025)

The term “DRUG2102” is a critical identifier for individuals facing cannabis possession charges within the Florida legal system, specifically in Hillsborough County. As the legal landscape around cannabis evolves in 2025, understanding the implications of a DRUG2102 charge is paramount. This designation, tied to Florida Statute 893, signifies possession of cannabis and carries varying penalties based on the quantity involved.

In drug laws, cannabis possession remains a complex issue in Hillsborough County, Florida. If you’re facing a DRUG2102 charge, you need experienced legal counsel to protect your rights and future. W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., with decades of experience in criminal defense, is here to guide you through this challenging process.

DRUG2102 Cannabis

Understanding DRUG2102: Possession of Cannabis

DRUG2102 specifically refers to the Florida statute related to the possession of cannabis. While societal attitudes towards cannabis are shifting, Florida law still treats possession seriously. Understanding the nuances of this charge is crucial for building a strong defense.

Florida Statutes Chapter 893 governs drug offenses, including cannabis possession. As of 2025, while medical marijuana is legal with a prescription, recreational use remains prohibited. The penalties for possession vary based on the amount of cannabis involved and prior offenses.

Penalties for Cannabis Possession in Hillsborough County

The severity of the penalties depends on the amount of cannabis possessed. Here’s a general overview:

Amount of CannabisOffense LevelPotential Penalties
Less than 20 gramsMisdemeanorUp to 1 year in jail, $1,000 fine
20 grams to 25 poundsFelonyUp to 5 years in prison, $5,000 fine
25 pounds to 2,000 poundsFelonyUp to 15 years in prison, $10,000 fine
Over 2,000 poundsFelonyUp to 30 years in prison, $25,000 fine

Factors Influencing Your Case

Several factors can influence the outcome of your DRUG2102 case:

  • Amount of Cannabis: The quantity of cannabis directly impacts the severity of the charges.
  • Prior Criminal Record: Previous drug offenses can lead to harsher penalties.
  • Circumstances of the Arrest: Illegal search and seizure, lack of probable cause, and other procedural errors can be grounds for dismissal.
  • Proximity to Schools or Parks: Possession near these areas can result in enhanced penalties.
  • Intent to Sell or Distribute: Charges can escalate if there’s evidence of intent to sell.

Building a Strong Defense with W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr.

As your attorney, Casey Ebsary will meticulously examine every aspect of your case. He will:

  • Investigate the Arrest: Scrutinize the legality of the search and seizure.
  • Challenge Evidence: Identify any inconsistencies or errors in the prosecution’s case.
  • Negotiate with Prosecutors: Seek reduced charges or alternative sentencing.
  • Represent You in Court: Provide aggressive and effective legal representation.

Alternative Sentencing and Diversion Programs

In some cases, alternative sentencing options may be available, such as:

  • Pretrial Intervention Programs: These programs offer rehabilitation and community service in lieu of prosecution.
  • Drug Court: This specialized court focuses on rehabilitation for individuals with substance abuse issues.

Why Choose W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr.?

  • Extensive Experience: Decades of experience in criminal defense.
  • Personalized Attention: Every case is handled with care and dedication.
  • Aggressive Representation: Fighting for your rights and future.
  • Local Expertise: Deep understanding of the Hillsborough County legal system.

Contact Casey Ebsary: Your Legal Advocate

Facing a DRUG2102 charge can be overwhelming. Don’t navigate this alone. Contact W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. today for a confidential consultation.

DRUG2102 You can contact the Law Office of W.F.

You can contact the Law Office of W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. tel:+18132222220 for a free consultation by calling 1-877-793-9290 or by filling out our online contact form. (https://drug2go.com/contact-casey-the-lawyer/).

Contact Casey The Lawyer:

For immediate assistance, please visit the contact page: Contact Casey The Lawyer or call 813-222-2220. Your initial consultation is confidential, and we will discuss your options.

DRUG2102

Individuals searching for legal assistance related to DRUG2102 need a seasoned attorney who comprehends the nuances of Florida drug laws. W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr., with his extensive experience, provides dedicated legal representation for those charged under DRUG2102. His expertise in Hillsborough County’s courts ensures a robust defense, focusing on challenging evidence, negotiating with prosecutors, and advocating for reduced penalties or alternative sentencing. For those seeking clarity and legal support, understanding the context of DRUG2102 is the first step towards a favorable resolution.

Helpful Defenses Table

Potential Defense StrategiesDescription
Illegal Search and SeizureContesting the legality of how law enforcement obtained the evidence.
Lack of Probable CauseArguing that there was no valid reason for the initial stop or search.
EntrapmentClaiming that law enforcement induced the individual to commit the offense.
Chain of Custody IssuesQuestioning the handling and preservation of evidence.
Medical NecessityIn cases where medical cannabis use is legal, ensuring compliance with state regulations.

Cannabis Q&A:

FAQ Cannabis DRUG2102

What is DRUG2102?

DRUG2102 refers to the Florida statute related to the possession of cannabis.

What are the penalties for possessing less than 20 grams of cannabis?

It’s a misdemeanor, punishable by up to 1 year in jail and a $1,000 fine.

Can I go to jail for possessing cannabis in Hillsborough County?

Yes, the severity of the penalties depends on the amount of cannabis and your criminal history.

What is a pretrial intervention program?

It’s a program that offers rehabilitation and community service as an alternative to prosecution.

How can an attorney help with a DRUG2102 charge

An attorney can investigate your arrest, challenge evidence, negotiate with prosecutors, and represent you in court.

Is medical marijuana legal in Florida?

Yes, with a prescription, but recreational use remains illegal as of 2025.

What should I do if I’m arrested for cannabis possession?

Remain silent, request an attorney, and do not resist arrest.

Can prior offenses affect my current cannabis possession charge?

Yes, prior offenses can lead to harsher penalties.

What is drug court?

A specialized court focused on rehabilitation for individuals with substance abuse issues.

How do I contact W.F. “Casey” Ebsary Jr. for legal assistance?

A: Visit Contact Casey The Lawyer or call 813-222-2220.

Drug2Go.com

2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606Phone: 813-222-2220
Email: centrallaw@gmail.com

If you have been charged with DRUG2102 POSSESSION OF CANNABIS you can call a Defense Attorney Tampa at 1-877-793-9290 and tell me your story.

Form Code: DRUG2102
Florida Statute: 893.13.6A
Level: Fel (Felony)
Degree: 3rd
Description: POSSESSION OF CANNABIS

DRUG2102 POSSESSION OF CANNABIS one of the most commonly charged offenses in Hillsborough County, Florida.

Title XLVI CRIMES
Chapter 893 DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL

893.13 Prohibited acts; penalties.

(6)(a) It is unlawful for any person to be in actual or constructive possession of a controlled substance unless such controlled substance was lawfully obtained from a practitioner or pursuant to a valid prescription or order of a practitioner while acting in the course of his or her professional practice or to be in actual or constructive possession of a controlled substance except as otherwise authorized by this chapter. Any person who violates this provision commits a felony of the third degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

]]> <![CDATA[Marijuana Search – Protective Safety Sweep]]> https://www.drug2go.com/blog/marijuana-search-protective-safety-sweep/ https://www.drug2go.com/blog/marijuana-search-protective-safety-sweep/ Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:20:00 GMT Marijuana Search Protective Safety Sweep Tampa Florida Criminal Defense Lawyer notes a recent Search and seizure case involving a Residence and a Search Warrant. The Second District Court ruled that the protective sweep of the possession of marijuana defendant’s residence was improper. The court noted no basis for concern that drug evidence might be destroyed…

]]>
Tampa Florida Criminal Defense Lawyer, Search and seizure, Residence, possession of marijuana, possession of cannabis, Affidavit for Search Warrant, Probable Cause, Search Warrant, odor, Protective Sweep
Marijuana Search
Protective Safety Sweep
Tampa Florida Criminal Defense Lawyer notes a recent Search and seizure case involving a Residence and a Search Warrant. The Second District Court ruled that the protective sweep of the possession of marijuana defendant’s residence was improper. The court noted no basis for concern that drug evidence might be destroyed before a search warrant could be obtained.

Marijuana Search – Safety Sweep

The appeals court also found no facts to support a reasonable belief that there was a person in the residence who could pose a danger to law enforcement. The observation of narcotics by officers during an improper protective sweep cannot be a valid basis for issuance of search warrant, even so, since the officers smelled marijuana when the suspect opened front door after officers had lawfully approached residence and knocked on front door, probable cause for issuance of warrant was found. When the court finds that police unlawfully obtained some of evidence contained in an affidavit or application for a search warrant, the trial court must then determine if there was probable cause to support issuance of warrant based on any independent and lawfully obtained evidence. The trial court committed error in granting the motion to suppress because probable cause for issuance of warrant was established without considering evidence obtained in improper protective sweep. Case Excerpts: “[T]he sweep of the house was improper based on the concern that evidence may be destroyed because there were no facts supporting an objectively reasonable basis for the belief that someone inside the house could destroy evidence while the warrant was being obtained. See United States v. Rivera, 825 F.2d 152, 156 (7th Cir. 1987) (“In determining whether the agents reasonably feared imminent destruction of the evidence, the appropriate inquiry is whether the facts, as they appeared at the moment of entry, would lead a reasonable, experienced agent to believe that evidence might be destroyed before a warrant could be secured.”).” “[T]here was no evidence that the house was occupied, the trial court correctly found that the protective sweep of the house for officer safety was improper as there were no specific and articulable facts supporting a reasonable belief that there was an individual in the house who could pose a danger to law enforcement. See Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325, 337 (1990) (“The Fourth Amendment permits a properly limited protective sweep in conjunction with an in-home arrest when the searching officer possesses a reasonable belief based on specific and articulable facts that the area to be swept harbors an individual posing a danger to those on the arrest scene.”).” “Where a court finds that police unlawfully obtained some of the evidence contained in the application for the search warrant, the court must then determine if there is probable cause to support the issuance of the warrant based on any independent and lawfully obtained evidence. Id. “[T]he court must excise the invalid allegations from the affidavit and determine whether sufficient valid allegations remain to support a finding of probable cause.” State v. Hood, 68 So. 3d 392, 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011).”

Source: STATE OF FLORIDA, v. IDALIA ROMAN Case No. 2D11-769 (Fla 2d DCA Nov. 7 2012).

Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

]]> <![CDATA[Drug Search Warrant for Marijuana | Reversed on Appeal | Tampa Appeal Lawyer Kenneth Siegel]]> https://www.drug2go.com/blog/drug-search-warrant-for-marijuana-reversed-on-appeal-tampa-appeal-lawyer-kenneth-siegel/ https://www.drug2go.com/blog/drug-search-warrant-for-marijuana-reversed-on-appeal-tampa-appeal-lawyer-kenneth-siegel/ Thu, 09 Dec 2010 03:29:00 GMT Manufacture Cannabis Conviction for Manufacture of Cannabis Tampa Drug Defense Attorney notes that my good friend Tampa Appeal Lawyer, Ken Siegel had a cannabis client’s conviction overturned. The defendants “were each charged with manufacture of cannabis, possession of cannabis, and possession of drug paraphernalia as a result of evidence seized during the search of their…

]]>
Conviction for Manufacture of Cannabis
Manufacture Cannabis

Conviction for Manufacture of Cannabis


Tampa Drug Defense Attorney notes that my good friend Tampa Appeal Lawyer, Ken Siegel had a cannabis client’s conviction overturned. The defendants “were each charged with manufacture of cannabis, possession of cannabis, and possession of drug paraphernalia as a result of evidence seized during the search of their home.” The court found the following language in the Affidavit for Search Warrant did not provide Probable Cause for the Search.

The citizen informant “specifically named [Name Omitted] , provided her vehicle descriptions, tag number and phone number in the messages. He also provided information on her new employment. The citizen specifically stated that [Name Omitted] and her boyfriend, [Name Omitted] were growing marijuana plants in their home and selling cocaine from the residence.”

The Court ruled, “The affidavit contained no allegations that anyone actually saw contraband in the couple’s residence and there were no facts from which the magistrate could conclude that contraband was and would still be located in the residence at the time the warrant issued. See Rand v. State, 484 So. 2d 1367, 1367 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (finding affidavit insufficient for failing to allege the specific time or times when contraband was observed on the premises).” The Second District ruled “We disagree and find that the good faith exception is inapplicable in this case.” Cannabis Charge Appeal Questions? Call Me Toll Free 1-877-793-9290.


Drug Search Warrant Marijuana Source: Case No. 2D09-844 Fighting for you or a friend. Law Office of W.F. ”Casey” Ebsary Jr 2102 W Cleveland St Tampa, Florida 33606 (813) 222-2220

Share this:

Like this:

Like Loading…

Related

]]>